Tanguy v. Arpaio

Filing 16

ORDER denying 12 Plaintiff's third Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim 14 . Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third amended comp laint. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28:1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/21/12.(TLJ)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9
10
11
12

Matthew William Tanguy,

13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16
17

Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-2505-PHX-RCB (DKD)
ORDER

18
19
20

in Phoenix, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and

21

an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 1, 3.) Plaintiff also filed a second

22

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff later filed a First Amended

23

Complaint, which superceded the original Complaint in its entirety. (Doc. 9.) The Court

24

granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case and dismissed the First

25

Amended Complaint with leave to amend. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended

26

Complaint and another in forma pauperis application. (Doc. 12, 14.) The Court will deny

27

the third in forma pauperis application as moot because Plaintiff has already been granted

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff Matthew William Tanguy, who was then confined in the Lower Buckeye Jail

leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this case. (Doc. 10.) The Court will dismiss the

1

Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. (Doc. 14.)

2

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

3

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

4

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

5

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

6

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

7

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

8

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

9

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

10

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

11

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

12

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

13

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

14

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

15

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

16

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

17

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

18

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

19

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

20

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

21

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

22

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

23

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

24
25

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

26

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

27

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

28
JDDL-K

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

94 (2007) (per curiam)).
-2-

1

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

2

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

3

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

4

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

5

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

6

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

7

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Second

8

Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the Second Complaint may

9

possibly be saved by amendment, the Court will dismiss it with leave to amend.

10

II.

Second Amended Complaint

11

Plaintiff alleges two counts for threat to safety and denial of constitutionally adequate

12

medical care. He sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and “Durango Jail Staff.”

13

Plaintiff seeks compensatory relief.

14

Plaintiff alleges the following facts: between July 11, 2007 and August 30, 2007,

15

Plaintiff was incarcerated in Maricopa County’s Durango Jail. Plaintiff was assigned to the

16

top of bunk. In getting down from the top bunk, Plaintiff’s foot slipped off of the bottom

17

bunk and the right side of his face hit a metal rail. Plaintiff was stunned and had a deep

18

laceration. A detention officer took Plaintiff to the Day Room. About thirty minutes later,

19

he was escorted to a holding cell at the front of the Jail, where he remained for several hours

20

bleeding and in severe pain. Then two officers came to the door and slid a paper and pencil

21

to Plaintiff to sign. Plaintiff felt very disoriented but the officers told him to sign the paper

22

or they would not transport him to the emergency room. Plaintiff signed the paper in order

23

to obtain treatment of his injury. Plaintiff was taken to Maricopa County Hospital, where he

24

received stitches, which left a two inch scar.

25

III.

Failure to State a Claim

26
27

conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state

28
JDDL-K

To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the

law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v.
-3-

1

Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he

2

suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must

3

allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v.

4

Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

5

A.

Statute of Limitations

6

As an initial matter, Plaintiff’s claims appear to be facially barred by the statute of

7

limitations. The failure to state a claim includes circumstances where a defense is complete

8

and obvious from the face of the pleadings. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1228 (9th

9

Cir. 1984) (applying former § 1915(d) now codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)). Further,

10

a court may raise the defense of statute of limitations sua sponte. See Levald, Inc. v. City

11

of Palm Desert, 998 F.2d 680, 687 (9th Cir. 1993); see also Hughes v. Lott, 350 F.3d 1157,

12

1163 (11th Cir. 2003) (appropriate to dismiss prisoner’s complaint sua sponte as time-barred

13

under § 1915(e)(2)(B)); Nasim v. Warden, Maryland House of Corr., 64 F.3d 951, 956 (4th

14

Cir. 1995) (en banc) (same); Pino v. Ryan, 49 F.3d 51, 53 (2d Cir. 1995) (same); Moore v.

15

McDonald, 30 F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir. 1994) (same); Johnson v. Rodriguez, 943 F.2d 104,

16

107-08 (1st Cir. 1991) (same).

17

In § 1983 actions, the Court applies the statute of limitations of the forum state for

18

personal injury actions. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266, 274-76 (1985); TwoRivers v.

19

Lewis, 174 F.3d 987, 991 (9th Cir. 1999); Vaughan v. Grijalva, 927 F.2d 476, 478 (9th Cir.

20

1991). The Arizona statute of limitations for personal injury actions is two years. See A.R.S.

21

§ 12-542(1); Madden-Tyler v. Maricopa County, 943 P.2d 822, 824 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997);

22

Vaughan, 927 F.2d at 478. The Court must also apply any state rule for tolling to actions

23

brought under § 1983. Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 544 (1989); TwoRivers, 174 F.3d at

24

992. Arizona provides for tolling of the statute of limitation after a cause of action accrues

25

for the period during which a plaintiff was less than 18 years old or of unsound mind. A.R.S.

26

§ 12-502.

27
28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff’s claim arose no later than August 30, 2007, and he knew of his injury at the
time. He commenced this action on December 19, 2011, or more than four years after his
-4-

1

claim accrued. No basis for tolling of the statute of limitations appears in the Second

2

Amended Complaint.1 Absent allegations to support that the statute of limitations is

3

subject to tolling, Plaintiff’s claims and this action are time-barred.

4

below, Plaintiff will be afforded the opportunity to file a third amended complaint in which

5

he should allege any reason why the statute of limitations is subject to tolling. Absent such

6

allegations in a third amended complaint, Plaintiff’s claims are facially untimely and will be

7

dismissed as time-barred.

As discussed

8

B.

Durango Jail Staff

9

Plaintiff sues “Durango Jail Staff.” Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

10

requires the plaintiff to include the names of the parties in the action. As a practical matter,

11

it is impossible in most instances for the United States Marshal or his designee to serve a

12

summons and complaint or amended complaint upon an anonymous defendant. However,

13

the Ninth Circuit has held that where identity is unknown prior to the filing of a complaint,

14

the plaintiff should be given an opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown

15

defendants, unless it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that the

16

complaint would be dismissed on other grounds. Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d 1160,

17

1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (citing Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980)).

18

Further, where the names of individual defendants are unknown at the time a complaint is

19

filed, a plaintiff may refer to the individual unknown defendants as Defendant John Doe 1,

20

John Doe 2, and so on, and allege facts to support how each particular Doe defendant

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

1

Section 12-502 provides in relevant part that if a person is of unsound mind at the
time a claim accrues, “the period of such disability shall not be deemed a portion of the
period limited for commencement of the action. Such person shall have the same time after
removal of the disability which is allowed to others.” However, it is insufficient to
summarily claim inability to bring an action as a result of mental disability. Doe v. Roe, 955
P.2d 951, 964 (Ariz. 1998). “Unsound mind occurs when the ‘person is unable to manage
his affairs or to understand his legal rights or liabilities.’” Id. (quoting Allen v. Powell’s
Int’l, Inc., 270 P.2d 588, 589 (Ariz. 1974)). “This standard recognizes two separate inquiries
that may evince an unsound mind: (1) inability to manage daily affairs, and (2) inability to
understand legal rights and liabilities. The resulting inability to bring the action is a basis for
tolling the statute of limitations under unsound mind.” Id.
-5-

1

violated the plaintiff’s constitutional rights. A plaintiff may thereafter use the discovery

2

process to obtain the names of fictitiously-named defendants whom he believes violated his

3

constitutional rights and seek leave to amend to name those defendants.

4

As discussed above, Plaintiff will be granted leave to file a third amended complaint

5

in which he should address whether the statute of limitations may be tolled. In addition, in

6

an amended complaint, Plaintiff should name the officers who allegedly failed to obtain

7

prompt medical attention for his injuries. If the names of the officers are unknown, then

8

Plaintiff may refer to each officer by a fictitious name, e.g., John Doe 1, John Doe 2, and so

9

on and allege facts to support how each particular defendant violated his constitutional rights.

10

C.

Arpaio

11

Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio. Although Arpaio may properly

12

be sued for constitutional violations, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him. “A plaintiff

13

must allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally

14

involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194

15

(9th Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege

16

that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v. County of Los

17

Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001). Further, there is no respondeat superior

18

liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of a someone who

19

allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make him liable.

20

Dep’t of Soc.Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.

21

1989). A supervisor in his individual capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations

22

of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the

23

violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045.

Monell v.

24
25

custom, or practice that resulted in the violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Further,

26

Plaintiff has not alleged facts to support that Arpaio directly violated his constitutional rights

27

or that Arpaio was aware that Plaintiff’s rights were being violated but failed to act. Thus,

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff has not alleged facts to support that Arpaio enacted or enforced a policy,

Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Arpaio in his Second Amended Complaint and he will
-6-

1

be dismissed.

2

D.

3

Plaintiff asserts a claim for threat to safety. To state a claim under § 1983 for threat

4

to safety, an inmate must allege facts to support that he was incarcerated under conditions

5

posing a substantial risk of harm and that prison officials were “deliberately indifferent” to

6

those risks. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 832-33 (1994). To adequately allege

7

deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that a defendant knew of, but

8

disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate safety. Id. at 837. That is, “the official must both

9

[have been] aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk

10

Threat to Safety

of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also [have] draw[n] the inference.” Id.

11

Plaintiff has not alleged facts to support that the absence of ladders on the bunk beds

12

rose to the level of an excessive risk to inmate safety, such as, for example, alleging the

13

frequency of inmates being injured. Plaintiff also has not alleged facts to support that Arpaio

14

knew of – or knew of facts giving rise to an inference and drew the inference – that the lack

15

of ladders posed an excessive risk to inmate safety. For these reasons, in addition to his

16

failure to establish that the statute of limitations should be tolled, Plaintiff fails to state a

17

constitutional claim for threat to safety.

18

E.

19

Plaintiff alleges that he received constitutionally inadequate medical care. Not every

20

claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a violation of the Eighth

21

or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a plaintiff must show that the

22

defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439

23

F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A

24

plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating that failure to treat the

25

condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary and wanton infliction

26

of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096

27

(quotations omitted).

28
JDDL-K

Medical Care

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,
-7-

1

1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know

2

of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts

3

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and

4

he must also draw the inference.” Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837. Deliberate indifference in the

5

medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond to a prisoner’s pain

6

or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

7

Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally denies,

8

delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to the

9

prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

10

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

11

care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross

12

negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of

13

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

14

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

15

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does

16

not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.

17

Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

18

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley

19

v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference

20

must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction

21

of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

22

While Plaintiff alleges that he was seriously injured and required prompt medical care,

23

Plaintiff fails to connect his allegations to any properly named defendant. For that reason,

24

in addition to his failure to establish that the statute of limitations should be tolled, he fails

25

to state a claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical need. Plaintiff will be

26

afforded an opportunity to cure these deficiencies.

27

IV.

28
JDDL-K

Leave to Amend
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint will be dismissed
-8-

1

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may

2

submit a third amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of

3

Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a third amended complaint.

4

If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint

5

and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

6

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Third

7

Amended Complaint.” The third amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

8

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of any prior complaint

9

by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

10

A third amended complaint supersedes every prior complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

11

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

12

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat every prior complaint as

13

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in a prior

14

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a third amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814

15

F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

16

V.

Warnings

17

A.

Release

18

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

19

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

20

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

21

in dismissal of this action.

22

B.

Address Changes

23

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

24

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

25

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

26

action.

27
28
JDDL-K

C.

Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
-9-

1

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

2

to Plaintiff.

3

D.

Possible “Strike”

4

Because the First and Second Amended Complaints have been dismissed for failure

5

to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies

6

identified in this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision

7

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil

8

action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner

9

has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an

10

action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is

11

frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the

12

prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

13

E.

Possible Dismissal

14

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

15

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

16

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

17

Court.

18

IT IS ORDERED:

19

(1) Plaintiff’s third Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is denied. (Doc. 12.)

20

(2)

The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

21

(Doc. 14.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a third amended

22

complaint in compliance with this Order.
(3)

23

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

24

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

25

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
(4)

26
27

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

...

28
JDDL-K

- 10 -

1
2

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 21st day of March, 2012.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

- 11 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6