Johnson v. Ryan et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must provide Petitioner with a copy of the form recommended by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing an Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pu rsuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/5/12.(DMT)

1

WO

MDR

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

George Johnson,
Petitioner,

10
11

vs.

12
Director Charles Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-2519-PHX-GMS (DKD)
ORDER

15
16

On December 20, 2011, Petitioner George Johnson, who is confined in the Arizona

17

State Prison Complex-Tucson in Tucson, Arizona, filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas

18

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma

19

Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will dismiss the Petition without prejudice.

20

I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

21

Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis indicates that his inmate trust

22

account balance is less than $25.00. Accordingly, the Application to Proceed In Forma

23

Pauperis will be granted. See LRCiv 3.5(b).

24

II.

Petition

25

This is Petitioner’s third petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his

26

conviction in Maricopa County Superior Court, case #CR-2005-008016-001 DT, for

27

Burglary. On May 4, 2009, Petitioner filed his first petition for a writ of habeas corpus

28

1

regarding that conviction, Johnson v. Ryan, 09-CV-959-PHX-GMS (DKD). In a May 5,

2

2010 Order (Doc. 17 in 09-CV-959-PHX-GMS (DKD)), the Court dismissed the habeas

3

petition, without prejudice, because Petitioner had a pending state-court petition for post-

4

conviction relief when he filed the habeas petition. The Clerk of Court entered Judgment

5

accordingly (Doc. 18 in 09-CV-959).

6

On May 13, 2010, Petitioner filed his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus

7

regarding the same state-court conviction, Johnson v. Ryan, 10-CV-1052-PHX-GMS (DKD).

8

In a January 25, 2011 Order (Doc. 11 in 10-CV-1052-PHX-GMS (DKD)), the Court denied

9

the petition, and the Clerk of Court entered Judgment accordingly (Doc. 12 in 10-CV-1052).

10

Petitioner appealed (Doc. 13 in 10-CV-1052), but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

11

declined to issue a certificate of appealability (Doc. 16 in 10-CV-1052).

12

Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, a petitioner may not file a second or successive § 2254

13

petition in the district court unless the petitioner has obtained a certification from the Ninth

14

Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing the district court to consider the second or subsequent

15

§ 2254 petition. A habeas petition is “‘second or successive’ if it raises claims that were or

16

could have been adjudicated on their merits in an earlier petition.” Cooper v. Calderon, 274

17

F.3d 1270, 1273 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). The current petition, therefore, is a second or

18

successive petition.

19

Petitioner has not presented a certification from the Ninth Circuit authorizing the

20

Court to consider a second or subsequent § 2254 petition. Accordingly, the current Petition

21

and this action must be dismissed as a successive petition. The Court, however, will dismiss

22

the case without prejudice so that Petitioner can seek certification from the Ninth Circuit to

23

file a second or successive § 2254 petition.

24

Accordingly,

25

IT IS ORDERED:

26

(1)

Petitioner’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

27
28

-2-

1
2
3

(2)

Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) and this action are

dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.
(3)

The Clerk of Court must provide Petitioner with a copy of the form

4

recommended by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing an Application for Leave to

5

File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C.

6

§ 2255.

7

(4)

Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event

8

Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because

9

reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v.

10
11

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
DATED this 5th day of January, 2012.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

Form 12.
(New, 7/1/02)

Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS
for the NINTH CIRCUIT
95 Seventh Street
San Francisco, California 94103
Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition
Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Docket Number ________________________________________________________________
(to be provided by court)
Petitioner's name _______________________________________________________________
Prisoner registration number
Address ______________________________________________________________________
Instructions - Read Carefully
(1) This application, whether handwritten or typewritten, must be legible and signed by the petitioner under penalty
of perjury. An original and five (5) copies must be provided to the Clerk of the Ninth Circuit. The application
must comply with 9th Circuit Rule 22-3, which is attached to this form.
(2) All questions must be answered concisely. Add separate sheets if necessary.
(3) The petitioner shall serve a copy of this application and any attachments on respondent and must complete and
file a proof of service with this application.
(4) The petitioner shall attach to this application copies of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and
the district court's opinion in any prior federal habeas proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255 or state why
such documents are unavailable to petitioner.

You Must Answer the Following Questions:
(1) What conviction(s) are you challenging?
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

(2)

In what court(s) were you convicted of these crime(s)?

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

(3)

What was the date of each of your conviction(s) and what is the length of each sentence?

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________

For questions (4) through (9), provide information separately for each of your previous §§ 2254
or 2255 proceedings. Use additional pages if necessary.

(4)

With respect to each conviction and sentence, have you ever filed a petition or motion for habeas
corpus relief in federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255?
Yes G

No G

(a) In which federal district court did you file a petition or motion?
________________________________________________________________________
(b) What was the docket number? ______________________________________________
(c) On what date did you file the petition/motion? ___________________________________
(5)

What grounds were raised in your previous habeas proceeding?
(list all grounds and issues previously raised in that petition/ motion)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(6)

Did the district court hold an evidentiary hearing? Yes

G

No G

(7)

How did the district court rule on your petition/motion?

G

District court dismissed petition/motion? If yes, on what grounds?
__________________________________________________________________

G

District court denied petition/motion;

G

District court granted relief;
if yes, on what claims and what was the relief?
__________________________________________________________________

(Attach copies of all reports and orders issued by the district court.)
(8)

On what date did the district court decide your petition/motion?
________________________________________________________________________

(9)

Did you file an appeal from that disposition? Yes G

No G

(a) What was the docket number of your appeal? __________________________________
(b) How did the court of appeals decide your appeal?_______________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
(10)

State concisely each and every ground or issue you wish to raise in your current petition or
motion for habeas relief. Summarize briefly the facts supporting each ground or issue.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(11)

For each ground raised, was it raised in the state courts? If so, what did the state courts rule
and when?
________________________________________________________________________

(12)

For each ground/issue raised, was this claim raised in any prior federal petition/motion? (list
each ground separately)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(13)

For each ground/issue raised, does this claim rely on a new rule of constitutional law? (list each
ground separately and give case name and citation for each new rule of law)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(14)

For each ground/issue raised, does this claim rely on newly discovered evidence? What is the
evidence and when did you discover it? Why has this newly discovered evidence not been
previously available to you? (list each ground separately)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(15)

For each ground/issue raised, does the newly discovered evidence establish your innocence?
How?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(16)

For each ground/issue raised, does the newly discovered evidence establish a federal
constitutional error? Which provision of the Constitution was violated and how?
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

(17)

Provide any other basis for your application not previously stated.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

Date: __________________

Signature:_________________________________

Proof of Service on Respondent MUST be Attached.