Smith v. Astrue

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. The Court's previous order 36 is amended to award Plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $9,217.26. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/15/13.(TLJ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jerry Smith, No. CV-11-02524-PHX-DGC Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On February 27, 2013, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff’s motion for 16 attorneys’ fees in the amount of $7,945.46. Doc. 36. That amount was the original 17 amount Plaintiff requested in his motion. Doc. 31. Because the government opposed the 18 motion, Plaintiff was required to spend additional time researching and drafting a reply 19 brief. Doc. 35. In the reply, Plaintiff’s counsel noted that he had spent an additional 4.4 20 hours in preparation and that he now requested the sum of $9,217.26. Doc. 35 at 10. The 21 Court overlooked the additional request, and its failure to consider it was manifest error. 22 “Fees on fees” are permissible in the Ninth Circuit when the agency position is not 23 substantially justified. Atkins v. Apfel, 154 F.3d 986, 988-89 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court 24 found in its previous order that the Commissioner’s position was not substantially 25 justified and that the requested fees were reasonable. The Court finds that the additional 26 time to prepare a reply brief is also reasonable. 27 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 37) is 28 granted. The Court’s previous order (Doc. 36) is amended to award Plaintiff attorney’s 1 2 fees in the amount of $9,217.26. Dated this 15th day of March, 2013. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?