Brown-Hunter v. Astrue

Filing 42

ORDER denying 29 Application for Attorney Fees. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/20/2016.(LMR)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Kim Brown-Hunter, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 Carolyn W. Colvin, 13 Defendant. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-11-2573-PHX-FJM ORDER 15 16 17 The court has before it plaintiff’s Motion for attorneys fees (Doc. 29), defendant’s 18 Response (Doc. 38), and plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. 41). Plaintiff is entitled to fees under the 19 EAJA unless the government’s position was substantially justified. In affirming the 20 Commissioner’s denial of benefits, we concluded that the ALJ gave clear and convincing 21 reasons to support his findings that plaintiff’s impairments were less serious than she 22 claimed. Doc. 22 at 3. Each inconsistency that we relied upon was identified by the ALJ. 23 Id. We did not make independent findings. Nevertheless, the court of appeals thought we 24 did. Slip Op. at 15. But in remanding for further administrative proceedings, even the court 25 of appeals acknowledged that there remain “crucial questions” because of the 26 “inconsistencies between [her] testimony and the medical evidence in the record.” Slip Op. 27 at 19. Taken as a whole, the opinion of the court of appeals suggests the ALJ’s written 28 decision suffered from technical rather than substantive defects. 1 Having carefully reviewed our order (Doc. 22) and the opinion of the court of appeals, 2 we conclude that the government’s position was substantially justified. Indeed, in light of 3 this record, it would have been irresponsible for the government not to have defended this 4 case. We would be greatly surprised if the outcome were to change on remand. The ALJ 5 need only draw an even more detailed roadmap. 6 7 8 Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING plaintiff’s Motion for attorneys fees. (Doc. 29). DATED this 20th day of January, 2016. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?