Brown-Hunter v. Astrue
Filing
42
ORDER denying 29 Application for Attorney Fees. See order for details. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 1/20/2016.(LMR)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Kim Brown-Hunter,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
Carolyn W. Colvin,
13
Defendant.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-11-2573-PHX-FJM
ORDER
15
16
17
The court has before it plaintiff’s Motion for attorneys fees (Doc. 29), defendant’s
18
Response (Doc. 38), and plaintiff’s Reply (Doc. 41). Plaintiff is entitled to fees under the
19
EAJA unless the government’s position was substantially justified. In affirming the
20
Commissioner’s denial of benefits, we concluded that the ALJ gave clear and convincing
21
reasons to support his findings that plaintiff’s impairments were less serious than she
22
claimed. Doc. 22 at 3. Each inconsistency that we relied upon was identified by the ALJ.
23
Id. We did not make independent findings. Nevertheless, the court of appeals thought we
24
did. Slip Op. at 15. But in remanding for further administrative proceedings, even the court
25
of appeals acknowledged that there remain “crucial questions” because of the
26
“inconsistencies between [her] testimony and the medical evidence in the record.” Slip Op.
27
at 19. Taken as a whole, the opinion of the court of appeals suggests the ALJ’s written
28
decision suffered from technical rather than substantive defects.
1
Having carefully reviewed our order (Doc. 22) and the opinion of the court of appeals,
2
we conclude that the government’s position was substantially justified. Indeed, in light of
3
this record, it would have been irresponsible for the government not to have defended this
4
case. We would be greatly surprised if the outcome were to change on remand. The ALJ
5
need only draw an even more detailed roadmap.
6
7
8
Accordingly, it is ORDERED DENYING plaintiff’s Motion for attorneys fees. (Doc.
29).
DATED this 20th day of January, 2016.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?