Red River Resources Incorporated v. Mariner Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
215
ORDER that the 214 Recommendations of the Special Master are accepted. On or before Friday, September 27, 2013, plaintiff and defendant Collazo shall provide the court with a copy of their settlement agreement, together with each party's proposed form of judgment. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 9/20/2013. (See Order for details.)(LFIG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
RED RIVER RESOURCES, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs.
)
)
MARINER SYSTEMS, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
)
MARINER SYSTEMS, INC.,
)
)
Counterclaim-Plaintiff, )
)
vs.
)
)
RED RIVER RESOURCES, INC., et al.,
)
)
Counterclaim-Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
No. 2:11-cv-2589-H.R.H.
ORDER
Case Status
The court is in receipt of the Special Master’s status report and recommendations of September 19, 2013.1
The recommendations of the Special Master are
accepted.
On or before Friday, September 27, 2013, plaintiff and defendant Collazo shall
provide the court with a copy of their settlement agreement, together with each party’s
proposed form of judgment.
Unless plaintiff and defendant Collazo agree otherwise, they shall serve and file
simultaneously – on October 4, 2013 – their arguments in favor of their respective form
1
Docket No. 214.
Order – Case Status
-1-
of judgment and in opposition to the opposing party’s proposed form of judgment.
Either party may serve and file a reply memorandum on or before October 8, 2013. A
party’s opening memorandum shall not exceed 10 pages and a reply memorandum
shall not exceed 5 pages.
The court thanks the Special Master for his assistance.
DATED at Anchorage, Alaska, this 20th day of September, 2013.
/s/ H. Russel Holland
United States District Judge
Order – Case Status
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?