Essex Music Incorporated et al v. Sonora Claremont Incorporated et al

Filing 28

JUDGMENT ON WRIT OF GARNISHMENT: IT IS ORDERED that Judgment Creditor's Motion to Expedite Entry of Judgment (Doc. 26) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment Creditors' Motion for Garnishment Judgment (Doc. 17) is granted. Judgme nt Creditors Essex Music, Inc, Sony/ATV Harmony, Panther Music Corp., WB Music Corp., and Chappell & Co., Inc. shall have judgment against Garnishee American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. from the amount disclosed in American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.'s Answer in Garnishment as to Judgment Debtors Sonora Claremont, Inc. and Roberto Flores in the amount of $251.99. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/10/12. (LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Essex Music, Inc.; Sony/ATV Harmony;)
Panther Music Corp.; WB Music Corp.;)
)
Chappell & Co., Inc.,
)
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,)
)
)
vs.
)
)
Sonora Claremont, Inc.; Roberto Flores, )
)
Defendants/Judgment Debtors.)
)
American Express Travel Related)
)
Services, Inc.,
)
)
Garnishee.
)
)

No. MC 11-00081-PHX-JAT
JUDGMENT
ON WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

19
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Garnishment Judgment (Doc. 17).
20
The Court now rules on the Motion.
21
I.

BACKGROUND

22
On January 29, 2009, Judgment was entered against Defendants Sonora Claremont,
23
Inc. and Roberto Flores (“Judgment Debtors”), in favor of Plaintiffs Essex Music, Inc.,
24
Sony/ATV Harmony, Panther Music Corp., WB Music Corp., and Chappell & Co., Inc.
25
(“Judgment Creditors”), in the amount of $15,000 in statutory damages, $2,997.50 in
26
attorneys’ fees, and post-judgment interest as provided by law “from the date of entry of
27
judgment until the date the judgment is paid in full.” (Doc. 1).
28

1

On February 14, 2012, Judgment Creditors requested a writ of garnishment against

2

Garnishee American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. (“AmEx”) (Doc. 17). In its

3

Answer, AmEx indicated that, at the time the writ was served, it was in possession of

4

$251.99 in monies of Judgment Debtors. (Doc. 17-1 at ¶ IV). Copies of the Writ and

5

Summons, underlying Judgment, Notice to Judgment Debtors, Requests for Hearing, and

6

AmEx’s Answer were attached to the Judgment Creditors’ Motion for Garnishment and

7

mailed to Judgment Debtors on February 14, 2012 (Doc. 17 at 2).

8

II.

9

Process to enforce a judgment for the payment of money is a writ of execution, unless

10

the court directs otherwise. FED. R. CIV. P. 69(a)(1). Generally, a federal writ of execution

11

“must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located.” Id. Arizona’s

12

statutory scheme regarding garnishment of monies or property is located at Arizona Revised

13

Statutes (“A.R.S.”) sections 1570-1597.

LEGAL STANDARD

14

“A party who has an objection to the writ of garnishment, the answer of the garnishee

15

or the amount held by the garnishee or a party claiming an exemption for garnishment may,

16

not later than ten days after the receipt of the answer, file a written objection and request for

17

hearing.” ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 12-1580(A) (2011). “[I]f the answer shows that the

18

garnishee was indebted to the judgment debtor at the time of service of the writ, and no

19

objection to the writ or answer is timely filed, on application by the judgment creditor the

20

court shall enter judgment on the writ against garnishee for the amount of the nonexempt

21

monies of the judgment debtor owed or held by the garnishee at the time of the service of the

22

writ.” Id. at § 12-1584(A). Under Arizona’s garnishment statute, a presumption exists “that

23

a document has been received five days after it is mailed.” Id. at § 12-597(A).

24

III.

ANALYSIS

25

Judgment Creditors have properly complied with Arizona’s garnishment statutes

26

regarding the Writ of Garnishment of nonearnings. Judgment Debtors presumptively

27

received notice of the Writ of Garnishment and the Motion for Garnishment Judgment.

28

Judgment Debtors have not filed an objection to the writ or garnishment or the Motion for
-2-

1

Garnishment Judgment. AmEx has not requested a reimbursement fee for its costs incurred

2

in preparing its answer.

3

IV.

4

Based on the foregoing,

5

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment Creditor’s Motion to Expedite Entry of Judgment

6
7
8

CONCLUSION

(Doc. 26) is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment Creditors’ Motion for Garnishment
Judgment (Doc. 17) is granted.

9

Judgment Creditors Essex Music, Inc, Sony/ATV Harmony, Panther Music Corp.,

10

WB Music Corp., and Chappell & Co., Inc. shall have judgment against Garnishee American

11

Express Travel Related Services, Inc. from the amount disclosed in American Express Travel

12

Related Services, Inc.’s Answer in Garnishment as to Judgment Debtors Sonora Claremont,

13

Inc. and Roberto Flores in the amount of $251.99.

14

American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. shall remit the sum of $251.99 to

15

Judgment Creditors through their attorney, Peter J. Rathwell, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., One

16

Arizona Center, 400 East Van Buren, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202.

17

DATED this 10th day of April, 2012.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-