Exquisite Multimedia Incorporated v. Unknown Parties
Filing
22
ORDER that this action shall be dismissed on or after September 30, 2012 as to any unserved defendant, without further notice to plaintiff, unless before then plaintiff has served those defendants with process and has filed with the clerk of the court proof of service as required by Rule 4(l). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/18/2012. (LFIG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Exquisite Multimedia Inc.,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Does 1–146,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-12-0107-PHX-FJM
ORDER
15
16
After review of the docket, the court notes that the complaint in this matter was filed
17
on January 17, 2012. On April 12, 2012, we granted plaintiff leave to take early discovery
18
in order to discover the identity of defendants (doc. 9). To date, the docket does not show
19
that any defendant has been served.
20
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., that this action
21
shall be dismissed on or after September 30, 2012 as to any unserved defendant, without
22
further notice to plaintiff, unless before then plaintiff has served those defendants with
23
process and has filed with the clerk of the court proof of service as required by Rule 4(l).
24
25
26
27
28
DATED this 18th day of September, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?