Sanchez v. Ryan et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 19 . The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. That a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 1/7/13. (DMT)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Rigoberto Ortiz Sanchez, Petitioner, 10 11 vs. 12 Charles Ryan, 13 Respondent. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-12-00134-PHX-ROS ORDER 15 16 On January 20, 2012, Petitioner Rigoberto Ortiz Sanchez filed a petition for writ of 17 habeas corpus. (Doc. 1). On February 28, 2012, the Court issued an initial order requiring 18 Respondent answer the petition. The initial order also informed Petitioner that he was 19 required to keep his mailing address up to date. (Doc. 4 at 2). On October 25, 2012, 20 Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 21 recommending the petition for habeas corpus be denied. (Doc. 19). A copy of the R&R was 22 sent to Petitioner but it was returned to the Court, labeled “Out to Court, Maricopa County 23 will not accept.” (Doc. 20). As of January 4, 2013, Petitioner has not filed a change of 24 address nor has he filed objections to the R&R. 25 A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 26 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has 27 filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations, the district 28 court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are 1 filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted 3 in full. 4 Accordingly, 5 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED. The 6 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Petitioner 8 9 has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. DATED this 7th day of January, 2013. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?