Towery et al v. Brewer et al
Filing
5
ORDER that Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/7/12. (TLJ)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
) No. CV-12-245-PHX-ROS
)
) DEATH PENALTY CASE
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
) ORDER
)
Janice K. Brewer, Governor of Arizona, et)
)
al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Robert Towery, et al.,
17
Plaintiffs, Arizona prisoners under sentence of death, have filed a civil rights
18
Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court will order Defendants to respond to the
19
Complaint.
20
I.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
21
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against
22
a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
23
§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised
24
claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may
25
be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
26
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
27
1
II.
Complaint
2
In their five-count Complaint, Plaintiffs sue the following Defendants: Arizona
3
Governor Janice K. Brewer, Arizona Department of Corrections Director Charles L. Ryan,
4
Eyman Unit Warden Ron Credio, Florence Unit Warden Lance Hetmer, various unidentified
5
members of the IV and Special Operations Teams, and Does 1-25. In Claim One, Plaintiffs
6
allege that disparate treatment across executions violates the Equal Protection Clause. In
7
Claim Two, Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s lethal injection protocol lacks adequate
8
safeguards to protect against the risk of pain, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In
9
Claim Three, Plaintiffs allege that administration of a three-drug protocol using imported
10
pancuronium bromide violates their rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
11
In Claim Four, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants have failed to provide adequate notice of the
12
specific drugs and the type of venous access that will be used in executions, in violation of
13
the Fourteenth Amendment. In Claim Five, Plaintiffs allege that Arizona’s lethal injection
14
protocol violates their rights to due process and to access to the courts, in violation of the
15
First, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. In their Prayer for Relief, Plaintiffs seek
16
declaratory and injunctive relief. The Court has reviewed the Complaint and finds that
17
Plaintiffs have stated claims for relief. Therefore, the Court will require Defendants to
18
answer or otherwise respond to all five counts in the Complaint.
19
Accordingly,
20
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the
21
Complaint within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal
22
Rules of Civil Procedure.
23
DATED this 7th day of February, 2012.
24
25
26
27
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?