Reed v. Ryan et al
Filing
14
ORDER ACCEPTING 13 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/20/12. (LSP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Robert Reed,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 12-00248-PHX-FJM
ORDER
15
16
The court has before it plaintiff's complaint (doc. 1) and the Report and
17
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 13), recommending dismissal
18
of this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on February 6, 2012. On May 29, 2012, the court
19
advised plaintiff that he "must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court
20
within 21 days of the filing of this Order" (doc. 7 at 7). The summons for the three remaining
21
defendants were returned unexecuted. The court issued an order to show cause why this
22
action should not be dismissed, to which plaintiff failed to respond (doc. 12). The Magistrate
23
Judge recommended dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule
24
4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., and plaintiff failed to respond.
25
Dismissal is appropriate pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., which requires service
26
within 120 days after the complaint is filed. If a defendant is not timely served, the court
27
"must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be
28
made within a specified time." Plaintiff was warned that his action could be dismissed if he
1
failed to properly serve defendants. Not only did he fail to comply with the Federal Rules
2
of Civil Procedure, he also failed to comply with or respond to court orders.
3
4
5
IT IS ORDERED ACCEPTING the recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (doc. 13) and DISMISSING this action without prejudice.
DATED this 20th day of September, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?