Mahuwe v. Petsmart Incorporated

Filing 14

ORDER Plaintiff has filed a document (Doc. 13 ) that appears to be his response to the Court's order requiring a more definite statement (Doc. 12). The document does not provide a more definite statement and does not comply with the Court' s order of April 9, 2012 (Doc. 12). Plaintiff shall, on or before May 11, 2012, file an amended complaint that complies with and addresses the issues set forth in sections II and III of the Court's order of April 9, 2012 (Doc. 12). Plaintiff is again warned that if he fails to comply with these requirements by May 11, 2012, the Court likely will dismiss this case for failure to comply with the Court's orders and for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 4/27/2012. (KMG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Roger Mahuwe,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

No. CV12-0263-PHX-DGC
ORDER

v.
Petsmart,
Defendant.

14
15
16

Plaintiff has filed a document (Doc. 13) that appears to be his response to the

17

Court's order requiring a more definite statement (Doc. 12). The document does not

18

provide a more definite statement and does not comply with the Court's order of

19

April 9, 2012 (Doc. 12). Plaintiff shall, on or before May 11, 2012, file an amended

20

complaint that complies with and addresses the issues set forth in sections II and III of the

21

Court's order of April 9, 2012 (Doc. 12). Specifically, Plaintiff's amended complaint

22

must include (1) numbered paragraphs, with each paragraph limited to a single allegation

23

or issue, (2) state the basis for the Court's jurisdiction over this case, (3) set forth factual

24

detail in support of his claim, such as the detail contained in the written statement

25

attached to his original complaint, (4) set forth the legal basis for his claim (the statute or

26

common law under which he is making a claim), and (5) identify the relief he seeks in

27

this case. Plaintiff is again warned that if he fails to comply with these requirements by

28

May 11, 2012, the Court likely will dismiss this case for failure to comply with the

1

Court's orders and for failure to prosecute.

2

Dated this 27th day of April, 2012.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-