Mahuwe v. Petsmart Incorporated

Filing 22

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/2012.(KMG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Roger Mahuwe,
Plaintiff,

10
11
12
13

No. CV12-0263-PHX-DGC
ORDER

v.
Petsmart,
Defendant.

14

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “Motion: Need more times.” Doc. 21. The

15

motion does not indicate what date or dates Plaintiff wishes to extend, nor does it give

16

good cause for an extension of time. This case is set for a Rule 16 Case Management

17

Conference on July 20, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. before the Honorable David G. Campbell, 401

18

West Washington Street, Courtroom 603, Phoenix, Arizona 85003. The Rule 16 Case

19

Management Conference will be held at the scheduled time.

20

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 21) is denied.

21

Dated this 12th day of July, 2012.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28