Maduena v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, accepting the Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Recommendation and denying and dismissing with prejudice the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 ; denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Habeas Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 5/21/13. (REW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Genaro Lopez Maduena,
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
The court has before it petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1), respondents’ response (doc. 6), and petitioner’s reply (doc. 7). We
also have before us the report and recommendation from the United States Magistrate Judge
recommending that the petition be dismissed as untimely (doc. 8). No objection to the report
and recommendation was filed and the time for doing so has expired.
Pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, we accept the recommended
decision of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED DENYING
AND DISMISSING with prejudice the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING a certificate of appealability and leave
to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the habeas petition is justified
by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable.
DATED this 21st day of May, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?