Smith # 036085 v. Ryan et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting 31 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply; Petitioner shall file a Reply no later than May 22, 2013. See PDF document for details. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/16/13.(LSP)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
Joe Clarence Smith,
Petitioner,
vs.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-12-00318-PHX-PGR
DEATH PENALTY CASE
ORDER
15
16
Before the Court is Petitioner’s unopposed motion for a 30-day continuance to file his
17
reply brief. The motion is based primarily on counsel’s workload. The Court will permit the
18
instant request but cautions both parties that no further continuances will be authorized
19
absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances and that workload does not constitute an
20
extraordinary circumstance. The Court expects the parties to adhere to the remaining
21
deadlines and is not inclined to permit any further modification of the briefing schedule.
22
Based on the foregoing,
23
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for 30-Day Extension of Time
24
to File Reply (Doc. 31) is granted. The briefing schedule is modified as follows:
25
1.
Petitioner shall file a Reply no later than May 22, 2013.
26
2.
Any motion for evidentiary development shall be filed no later than June 12,
27
28
2013.
1
3.
2
3
4
A response to any motion for evidentiary development shall be filed no later
than July 2, 2013.
4.
A reply to any response to a motion for evidentiary development shall be filed
no later than July 11, 2013.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule set forth herein will not be
6
modified absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances unrelated to counsel’s workload.
7
DATED this 16th day of April, 2013.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?