Smith # 036085 v. Ryan et al

Filing 36

ORDER denying 35 Petitioner's Motion for 21-Day Extension of Time to File Reply. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/15/13.(LSP)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Joe Clarence Smith, Petitioner, vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-12-00318-PHX-PGR DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER 15 Before the Court is Petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file the 16 reply brief. In its order granting Petitioner’s first extension motion, the Court indicated that 17 no further continuances would be authorized absent a showing of extraordinary 18 circumstances and that workload does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance. The 19 instant motion fails to set forth extraordinary circumstances. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for 21-Day Extension of Time to File Reply (Doc. 35) is denied. DATED this 15th day of May, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?