Smith # 036085 v. Ryan et al

Filing 36

ORDER denying 35 Petitioner's Motion for 21-Day Extension of Time to File Reply. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/15/13.(LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Joe Clarence Smith,
Petitioner,
vs.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-12-00318-PHX-PGR
DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

15

Before the Court is Petitioner’s second motion for an extension of time to file the

16

reply brief. In its order granting Petitioner’s first extension motion, the Court indicated that

17

no further continuances would be authorized absent a showing of extraordinary

18

circumstances and that workload does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance. The

19

instant motion fails to set forth extraordinary circumstances.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for 21-Day
Extension of Time to File Reply (Doc. 35) is denied.
DATED this 15th day of May, 2013.