Benitez v. Arpaio et al

Filing 9

ORDER, the First Amended Complaint 7 is dismissed for failure to state a claim; Plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order; if Plaintiff fails to file comply with this order, the Clerk must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 7/7/12. (REW)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9
10
11
12

Sergio Cortez Benitez,
Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

Maricopa County, et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 12-0560-PHX-RCB (JFM)
ORDER

17
18

Plaintiff Sergio Cortez Benitez, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix,

19

Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an Order filed

20

on April 27, 2012, the Court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave

21

to amend. Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 7.) The Court will dismiss

22

the First Amended Complaint with leave to amend.

23

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

24
25

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

26

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

27

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

28
JDDL-K

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

1

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

2

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

3

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

4

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

5

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

6

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

7

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

8

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

9

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

10

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

11

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

12

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

13

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

14

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

15

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

16

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

17

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

18

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

19

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

20

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

21

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

22
23

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

24

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

25

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

26

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

27

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

28
JDDL-K

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s First
-2-

1

Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the First Amended Complaint

2

may possibly be saved by amendment, will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave

3

to amend.

4

II.

First Amended Complaint

5

Plaintiff alleges one count for threat to safety. He sues: Maricopa County, the

6

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department (MCSO), Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M.

7

Arpaio, and Maricopa County Correctional Health Services (CHS).

8

compensatory relief.

Plaintiff seeks

9

Plaintiff alleges the following facts: on May 27, 2011 between 3:30A.M. and

10

4:00A.M., Plaintiff and other inmates were awakened to go to court. Officer Stacey refused

11

to allow Plaintiff to take his walking cane to court, even after Plaintiff told her that he needed

12

a cane to walk due to back problems. Stacey refused to allow him to take the cane and

13

shackled him leg and hand. Plaintiff showed her his medical authorization form, but Stacey

14

said it was expired. Another officer said that he would try to contact the medical department,

15

but Stacey told Plaintiff to get going. At the holding tank, Plaintiff fell and officers called

16

for a wheel chair. Plaintiff was placed in the wheel chair and taken to court. After court,

17

Plaintiff asked to go to medical, but was instead taken back to his pod where other inmates

18

had to carry him to his cell. Plaintiff alleges that due to this incident his back problems have

19

worsened, he is unable to walk, he has reduced balance, he has bladder difficulties, and he

20

must now use a wheelchair instead of a walking cane.

21

III.

Failure to State a Claim

22
23

he complains was committed by a person acting under color of state law, and (2) the conduct

24

deprived him of a constitutional right. Balisteri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699

25

(9th Cir. 1988). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a

26

result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between

27

the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377

28
JDDL-K

To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that (1) the conduct about which

(1976).
-3-

1

A.

MCSO

2

Plaintiff again names MCSO as a Defendant. As the Court previously informed

3

Plaintiff, MCSO is not a proper defendant under § 1983. (Doc. 5.) Claims under § 1983 are

4

directed at “bodies politic and corporate.” Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658,

5

688-89 (1978). Under § 1983, Congress intended municipalities and other local government

6

units to be included among those persons to whom § 1983 applies. Id. at 689-690. In

7

Arizona, the responsibility for operating jails and caring for prisoners is placed by law upon

8

the sheriff and the County. See A.R.S. §§ 11-251(8), 11-291(A), 11-441(A)(5), 31-101.

9

MCSO is simply an administrative creation of the sheriff to allow him to carry out his

10

statutory duties; it is not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. See e.g., Petaway

11

v. City of New Haven Police Dep’t, 541 F. Supp.2d 504 (D. Conn. 2008); Pahle v.

12

Colebrookdale Tp., 227 F. Supp.2d 361 (E.D. Pa. 2002). Accordingly, MCSO will be again

13

dismissed from this action.

14
15

Plaintiff also sues CHS. While Arizona places responsibility for operating county

16

jails by law upon the sheriff, see A.R.S. §§ 11-141(A)(5), 31-101, Maricopa County is

17

responsible for the provision of medical care to inmates. CHS is an administrative creation

18

of the County that is not a “person” amenable to suit under § 1983. Even if the Court

19

construed Plaintiff’s claims as brought against Maricopa County, which he has named as a

20

Defendant, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against the County. A municipality is a “person”

21

for purposes of § 1983, i.e., a municipality such as a city or county, and may be sued. See

22

Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163,

23

166 (1993); Monell, 436 U.S. at 694. To state a claim against a municipality under § 1983,

24

a plaintiff must allege facts to support that his constitutional rights were violated pursuant

25

to a policy or custom of the municipality. Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186,

26

1188 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91); Thompson v. City of Los Angeles,

27

885 F.2d 1439, 1443 (9th Cir. 1989)). A municipality may not be sued solely because an

28
JDDL-K

B.

CHS and Maricopa County

injury was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442
-4-

1

F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, a § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant

2

“cannot succeed as a matter of law” unless a plaintiff: (1) contends that the municipal

3

defendant maintains a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury; and (2)

4

explains how such policy or custom caused the plaintiff’s injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435

5

F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant to

6

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)).

7

Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that Maricopa County maintained a policy or

8

custom that resulted in the violation of Plaintiff’s federal constitutional rights. He also fails

9

to allege facts to support that any constitutional injury was the result of a municipal policy

10

or custom. Accordingly, Plaintiff also fails to state a claim against Maricopa County.

11

C.

12

Plaintiff also sues Sheriff Arpaio. While Arpaio may be sued for constitutional

13

Sheriff Arpaio

violations, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him.

14

“A plaintiff must allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was

15

personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d

16

1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff

17

must allege that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez, 294

18

F.3d 1188. Further, there is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s

19

position as the supervisor of someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional

20

rights does not make him liable. Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040,

21

1045 (9th Cir. 1989).

22

constitutional violations of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the

23

violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at

24

1045.

A supervisor in his individual capacity, “is only liable for

25
26

support that Arpaio enacted or enforced a policy, custom, or practice that resulted in the

27

denial of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Plaintiff also has not alleged facts to support that

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff fails to allege any facts against Arpaio. Plaintiff has not alleged facts to

Arpaio directly violated his constitutional rights or that Arpaio was aware that Plaintiff’s
-5-

1

rights were being violated but failed to act. For that reason, Plaintiff fails to state a claim

2

against Arpaio and he will be dismissed.

3

D.

Count I

4

Plaintiff designates Count I as a claim for threat to safety. To state a claim under

5

§ 1983 for failure to protect or threats to safety, an inmate must allege facts to support that

6

he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm and that prison

7

officials were “deliberately indifferent” to those risks. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825,

8

832-33 (1994). To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must allege facts to

9

support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate safety. Id. at

10

837. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the inference

11

could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also [have]

12

draw[n] the inference.” Id.

13

Plaintiff alleges that Officer Stacey refused to allow him to take his cane to court, that

14

he fell while going to court and required a wheelchair, and that his back problems have

15

worsened and he now requires a wheelchair.

16

As an initial matter, Plaintiff has not named Stacey, the officer who took his cane, as

17

a defendant. Second, while Plaintiff alleges that Stacey refused to allow him to take his cane

18

even after he informed her of his medical condition and provided documentation, Plaintiff

19

does not allege facts to support that Stacey knew or should have known that refusing to allow

20

him to take his cane, or providing him a wheelchair, posed a substantial threat to his safety.

21

For example, Plaintiff does not allege that the medical documentation he showed Stacey

22

indicated that he was unable to walk without assistance or documented the severity of his

23

condition. In any event, Plaintiff fails to connect his allegations to any named Defendant.

24

Accordingly, he fails to state a claim and Count I will be dismissed.

25

IV.

Leave to Amend

26
27

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may

28
JDDL-K

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for

submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of
-6-

1

Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second amended complaint.

2

If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the second amended

3

complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

4

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second

5

Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

6

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

7

Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim

8

per count.

9

A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First Amended

10

Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v.

11

Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will

12

treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d

13

at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or First Amended

14

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a second amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814

15

F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

16

V.

Warnings

17

A.

Release

18

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

19

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

20

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

21

in dismissal of this action.

22

B.

Address Changes

23

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

24

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

25

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

26

action.

27
28
JDDL-K

C.

Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
-7-

1

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

2

to Plaintiff.

3

D.

Possible “Strike”

4

Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim,

5

if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in

6

this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C.

7

§ 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal

8

a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

9

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal

10

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,

11

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is

12

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

13

E.

14

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

15

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

16

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

17

Court).

18

IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

19

Possible Dismissal

The First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc.

20

7.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint

21

in compliance with this Order.
(2)

22

If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk

23

of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with

24

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

25

...

26
27
28
JDDL-K

-8-

1
2
3

(3)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 7th day of July, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6