Mestas v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. The Complaint is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/1/12.(LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
Andrew John Mestas,

No. CV 12-588-PHX-RCB (MEA)
ORDER

15
16

Plaintiff Andrew John Mestas, who is confined in the Maricopa County Fourth

17

Avenue Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

18

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave

19

to amend.

20

I.

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee

21
22

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

23

The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory

24

fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time

25

the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a

26

separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees

27

according to the statutory formula.

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

...

1

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

2

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

3

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

4

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

5

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

6

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

7

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

8

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

9

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

10

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

11

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

12

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

13

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

14

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

15

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

16

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

17

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

18

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

19

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

20

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

21

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

22

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

23

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

24

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

25

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

26

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

27

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

28
JDDL-K

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,
-2-

1

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

2

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

3

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

4

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

5

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

6

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

7

for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment,

8

will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.

9

III.

10
11

Complaint
Plaintiff names the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, two Unknown Detention

Officers, and one Unknown Registered Nurse as Defendants in the Complaint.

12

Plaintiff raises three claims for relief. In Count I, Plaintiff claims that his Eighth

13

Amendment rights were violated when on February 14, 2012, at 8:30 pm, a “goon squad

14

c[a]me in to [the] dorm yelling, [Plaintiff] yells back, [he is] handcuffed, stripped to boxers,

15

put in two different holding cells with only boxers.” Plaintiff states that he then “lost it,”

16

covered his door with his mattress and banged on the door, and cut his neck with a sharp

17

pencil. Plaintiff states that he was then put in the “rubber room” on suicide watch, at which

18

time Defendant Unknown Registered Nurse took his vitals. Plaintiff states he requested

19

water and was denied. Plaintiff’s additional allegations are unclear but it appears that

20

Plaintiff’s cell flooded and that Plaintiff was denied water until the next day.

21

In Count II, Plaintiff claims that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when he

22

“got into name calling with MCSO staff” and Defendant Unknown Detention Officer used

23

excessive force on him. Plaintiff claims that Defendant Unknown Detention Officer picked

24

up Plaintiff’s food tray and threw it at Plaintiff, striking Plaintiff in the mouth and chin.

25

Plaintiff claims that a sergeant later came to talk to him, saw the cut on Plaintiff’s chin and

26

said “you have a little cut on our lip, no big de[a]l.” Plaintiff claims that he asked to see a

27

nurse and the sergeant said yes, but that no one ever came.

28
JDDL-K

In Count III, Plaintiff appears to claim that he was denied access to his attorney.
-3-

1

Plaintiff appears to claim that he submitted multiple “legal request forms,” but that these

2

were lost. Plaintiff also makes some allegations about grievances and grievance appeals, but

3

the nature of these allegations are unclear.

4
5

Plaintiff seeks money damages.
IV.

Failure to State a Claim

6

A.

Defendants

7

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is not a proper defendant. In Arizona, the

8

responsibility of operating jails and caring for prisoners is placed by law upon the sheriff.

9

See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-441(A)(5); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 31-101. A sheriff’s office is simply

10

an administrative creation of the county sheriff to allow him to carry out his statutory duties

11

and not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. Accordingly, the Maricopa County

12

Sheriff’s Office will be dismissed from this action.

13

With respect to the individual Defendants, the use of John Doe-type appellations to

14

identify defendants is not favored, and as a practical matter, it is in most instances impossible

15

for the United States Marshal to serve a summons and complaint upon a John Doe defendant.

16

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint he must provide some type of identifying information

17

about each of the named Defendants.

18
19

A pretrial detainee’s claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises from

20

the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause rather than from the Eighth Amendment

21

prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 535 and

22

n.16 (1979). Nevertheless, the same standards are applied, requiring proof that the defendant

23

acted with deliberate indifference. See Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998).

24

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

25

care for the prisoner’s safety. Id. at 835. To state a claim of deliberate indifference,

26

plaintiffs must meet a two-part test. First, the alleged constitutional deprivation must be,

27

objectively, “sufficiently serious”; the official’s act or omission must result in the denial of

28
JDDL-K

B.

Count I-Conditions of Confinement

“the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Id. at 834. Second, the prison official
-4-

1

must have a “sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., he must act with deliberate

2

indifference to inmate health or safety. Id. In defining “deliberate indifference” in this

3

context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the official must both be aware

4

of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm

5

exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. at 837 (emphasis added).

6

Plaintiff’s claims in Count I are vague and difficult to follow. It is unclear which

7

individual Defendant is responsible for the conditions of which Plaintiff complains. Further,

8

Plaintiff fails to allege facts showing that individual Defendants were deliberately

9

indifference to a serious risk of harm to Plaintiff’s health or safety.

10

C.

Count II-Excessive Force

11

The Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clause, not the Eighth Amendment, protects

12

pretrial detainees from excessive force that amounts to punishment. Gibson v. County of

13

Washoe, 290 F.3d 1175, 1197 (9th Cir. 2002). “[T]he Fourth Amendment sets the

14

‘applicable constitutional limitations’ for considering claims of excessive force during

15

pretrial detention.” Id. (quoting Pierce v. Multnomah County, 76 F.3d 1032, 1043 (9th Cir.

16

1996).

17

The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the use of reasonable force. Tatum v. City

18

& County of San Francisco, 441 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2006). Whether the force was

19

excessive depends on “whether the officers’ actions [were] ‘objectively reasonable’ in light

20

of the facts and circumstances confronting them, without regard to their underlying intent or

21

motivation.” Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 397 (1989); Tatum, 441 F.3d at 1095; Lolli

22

v. County of Orange, 351 F.3d 410, 415 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court must balance the nature

23

and quality of the intrusion against the countervailing governmental interests at stake.

24

Graham, 490 U.S. at 396; Lolli, 351 F.3d at 415. Moreover,

25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

[t]he “reasonableness” of a particular use of force must be
judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene,
rather than with the 20/20 vision of hindsight. . . . . “Not every
push or shove, even if it may later seem unnecessary in the
peace of a judge’s chambers,” violates the Fourth Amendment.
Graham, 490 U.S. at 396 (citations omitted).
-5-

1

Although not clear, Plaintiff’s allegations in Count II do not appear to demonstrate

2

that the detention officers in question acted without provocation from Plaintiff. Plaintiff

3

states that he “got into name calling” with MCSO staff and that he “got into it with

4

[Defendant Unknown Detention Officer].” Plaintiff has not alleged facts showing the

5

Detention Officers actions were objectively unreasonable in light of the facts and

6

circumstances of the situation.

7

D.

Count III

8

Plaintiff’s claims in Count III are extremely vague. It is unclear whether Plaintiff was

9

denied all contact with his attorney or whether he was denied a specific form of contact

10

because the “legal request” forms were lost. Further, Plaintiff has not described who was

11

responsible for losing the forms or denying his requests, or how he was injured.

12

V.

Leave to Amend

13

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

14

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

15

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

16

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

17

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

18

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

19

If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements

20

telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name of

21

the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to do;

22

(4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of Plaintiff’s

23

constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of that

24

Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

25
26

fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury

27

suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If Plaintiff

state a claim. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of Defendants have
-6-

1

violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be dismissed.

2

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

3

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

4

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

5

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

6

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

7

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

8

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

9

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

10

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

11

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

12

VI.

Warnings

13

A.

Release

14

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

15

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

16

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

17

in dismissal of this action.

18

B.

Address Changes

19

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

20

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

21

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

22

action.

23

C.

Copies

24

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

25

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

26

to Plaintiff.

27
28
JDDL-K

D.

Possible “Strike”

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails
-7-

1

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

2

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

4

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

5

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

6

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

7

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

8

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

9

E.

Possible Dismissal

10

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

11

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

12

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

13

Court).

14

IT IS ORDERED:

15

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.

16

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

17

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.
(3)

18

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has

19

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

20

this Order.
(4)

21

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

22

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

23

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
(5)

24
25

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

...

26
27
28
JDDL-K

-8-

1
2

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 1st day of May, 2012.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6