Parsons et al v. Ryan et al

Filing 2226

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Ryan must appear at the Court's August 8-9, 2017 Status Conference so that the Court may address directly Defendants' compliance with the July 25, 2017 Order. Defendants must therefore make a rrangements for Defendant Ryan to appear at some point during the two days set aside for the hearing. He must be prepared to provide testimony regarding the video conference and the information conveyed to ADC employees and officials. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants must produce copies of any documents created in connection with the video conference including speaking notes, "talking points," or any power-point type presentations, as well as any documents which memorialize wha t information was communicated during the conference. Defendants must also produce copies of any documents created for employees or officials unable to participate in the teleconference. Any documents responsive to this Order must be filed no later than 6 p.m., Monday, August 7, 2017. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 8/4/17. (SLQ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Victor Antonio Parsons, et al., No. CV-12-0601-PHX-DKD Plaintiffs, 10 11 v. 12 Charles L. Ryan, et al., 13 REVISED ORDER Defendants. 14 15 The Court has reviewed Defendants’ Notice of Filing Declaration of Rachel Love 16 in Compliance with the Court’s Order and the attachment thereto (Doc. 2222, ref. Doc. 17 2209). This filing avows that in effectuating this Court’s July 25, 2017 Order, Defendant 18 Ryan sent an email to all ADC staff on July 27 to inform them of the Order and their 19 required compliance thereto. In the conclusion of that email, Director Ryan references a 20 video conference that was to occur in the days following his email. 21 understands, based upon its earlier notice via court-staff communication to counsel 22 regarding the imminence of this Order (for document preservation purposes), that no 23 recording or transcript of the video conference was made. This Order addresses the 24 possible existence of other records regarding this teleconference. It also remains unclear 25 how employees who were unable to participate in the video conference were to receive 26 the message conveyed during the conference. 27 /// 28 /// The Court 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Ryan must appear at the 2 Court’s August 8-9, 2017 Status Conference so that the Court may address directly 3 Defendants’ compliance with the July 25, 2017 Order. Defendants must therefore make 4 arrangements for Defendant Ryan to appear at some point during the two days set aside 5 for the hearing. 6 conference and the information conveyed to ADC employees and officials. He must be prepared to provide testimony regarding the video 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants must produce copies of any 8 documents created in connection with the video conference including speaking notes, 9 “talking points,” or any power-point type presentations, as well as any documents which 10 memorialize what information was communicated during the conference. Defendants 11 must also produce copies of any documents created for employees or officials unable to 12 participate in the teleconference. Any documents responsive to this Order must be filed 13 no later than 6 p.m., Monday, August 7, 2017. 14 Dated this 4th day of August, 2017. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?