VanDaalen v. Travis et al

Filing 14

ORDER that the "Petition: Am[i]cus Curie" (Doc. 13 ) is denied. This case must remain closed. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 9/17/2012. (KMG)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 8 9 Daniel VanDaalen, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 C.O. III C. Travis, et al., Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 12-642-PHX-RCB (ECV) ORDER 14 15 In an August 8, 2012 Order, the Court dismissed Plaintiff Daniel VanDaalen’s First 16 Amended Complaint and this action because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which 17 relief could be granted. The Clerk of Court entered Judgment on August 8, 2012. 18 19 20 21 22 On August 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed a “Petition: Am[i]cus Curie” (Doc. 13).1 Because this case is closed, the Court will deny the “Petition: Am[i]cus Curie.” IT IS ORDERED that the “Petition: Am[i]cus Curie” (Doc. 13) is denied. This case must remain closed. DATED this 17th day of September, 2012. 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 Although the document was signed by Plaintiff, it appears to have been written in support of Plaintiff by another inmate.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?