Stewart v. Ryan et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying without prejudice 14 Plaintiff's (Amended)Notice of Motion for Reconsideration re: Dismissing of Defendant(s) and, an Extension of Time to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 7/18/12.(LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Thomas Stewart, Jr.,

10
11

Plaintiff,
vs.

12
Charles Ryan, et al.,
13
Defendant.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-12-719-PHX-RCB-LOA
ORDER

15
This matter arises as a result of Plaintiff’s “(Amended) Notice of Motion for
16
Reconsideration re: Dismissing of Defendant(s) and, an Extension of Time to File.” (Doc.
17
14).
18
Plaintiff filed his Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on
19
April 4, 2012. (Doc.1) On July 2, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status
20
and screened his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. 12) The Court dismissed
21
all Defendants and claims except Count II against Defendant Barcklay-Dodson. Defendant
22
Barcklay-Dodson was ordered to answer Count II of the Complaint. To date, he has not yet
23
been served.
24
Although Plaintiff titles his Motion as one to Reconsider and a Request for an
25
Extension of Time, the body of his Motion neither states what it is that he would like to
26
reconsider, nor what deadline from which he is requesting an extension of time. Therefore,
27
the Court will deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion. He may either re-file a proper
28

1

Motion to Reconsider and/or a Motion for Extension of Time, including with specificity

2

what it is he is asking the Court to reconsider or what deadline he is asking the Court to

3

extend.

4

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “(Amended) Notice of Motion for Reconsideration

5

re: Dismissing of Defendant(s) and, an Extension of Time to File”, doc. 14, is DENIED

6

without prejudice.

7

Dated this 18th day of July, 2012.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-