Montgomery # 108379 v. Ryan et al
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING 46 Report and Recommendation. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. A Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/20/13. (vlg/LSP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
James Thurmond Montgomery,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-12-00758-PHX-ROS
ORDER
15
On October 8, 2013, Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf issued a Report and
16
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.
17
(Doc. 46). No objections were filed.
18
A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
19
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has
20
filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations, the district
21
court’s review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are
22
filed, the district court need not conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp.
23
2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted
24
in full.
25
Accordingly,
26
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 46) is ADOPTED. The
27
petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
28
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in
2
forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified by
3
a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.
4
DATED this 20th day of November, 2013.
5
6
7
8
9
Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?