Martinez v. Arpaio

Filing 10

ORDER - The First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/9/12. (LAD)

1
2

SC

WO

3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
Gilbert Martinez III,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 12-0779-PHX-DGC (DKD)
ORDER

14

Plaintiff Gilbert Martinez, III, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix,

15

Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an

16

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a May 14, 2012 Order, the Court dismissed

17

the Complaint because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim with leave to amend. Plaintiff has

18

filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 9.) The Court will dismiss the First Amended

19

Complaint with leave to amend.

20

I.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

21

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

22

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

23

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

24

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

25

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

26

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

27
28
JDDL-K

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

1

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

2

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

3

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

4

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

5

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

6

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

7

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

8

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

9

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

10

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

11

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

12

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

13

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.

14

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

15

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

16

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

17

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

18

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

19
20

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

21

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

22

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

23

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

24

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

25

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s First

26

Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the First Amended Complaint

27

may possibly be saved by amendment, will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave

28
JDDL-K

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

to amend.
-2-

1

II.

First Amended Complaint

2

Plaintiff alleges one count for denial of basic necessities or unconstitutional conditions

3

of confinement.1 Plaintiff sues Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, and Maricopa

4

County Supervisors Fulton Brock, Don Stapley, Andrew Kunasek, Max W. Wilson, and

5

Mary Rose Wilcox. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and compensatory relief.

6

Plaintiff alleges the following: on March 23, 2012, he was placed in a cell that had

7

previously been occupied by a “mental health” detainee. (Doc. 9 at 3.) The Maricopa

8

County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) documented that the cell was unsanitary, but placed the

9

Plaintiff in the cell anyway. Plaintiff asked for cleaning supplies, but was denied by

10

unidentified MCSO staff. Plaintiff fears that the unsanitary conditions in the cell put him at

11

risk of contracting MRSA, a staph infection, Hepatitis A, B, and C, ring worm, and AIDS.

12

Plaintiff alleges that he suffered severe emotional and psychological stress as a result.

13

III.

Failure to State a Claim

14

To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege that (1) the conduct about which

15

he complains was committed by a person acting under color of state law, and (2) the conduct

16

deprived him of a constitutional right. Balisteri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699

17

(9th Cir. 1988). In addition, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a

18

result of the conduct of a particular defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between

19

the injury and the conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377

20

(1976).

21

A.

22

Plaintiff sues Sheriff Arpaio. While Arpaio may be sued for constitutional violations,

23

Sheriff Arpaio

Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him.

24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

1

In addition, Plaintiff asserts violations of Graves v. Arpaio, CV77-0479. In Graves,
the Court ordered prospective relief against Sheriff Arpaio concerning ongoing conditions
for pretrial detainee at County jails. Many inmates apparently believe that they may receive
an immediate payout from a fund established in that class action. No such fund exists. The
inmates in Graves asked for injunctive relief and not monetary damages.
-3-

1

“A plaintiff must allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was

2

personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d

3

1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff

4

must allege that the official acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v.

5

County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2001). Further, there is no respondeat

6

superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone who

7

allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not make him liable. Monell v.

8

Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.

9

1989). A supervisor in his individual capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations

10

of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the

11

violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045.

12
13

support that Arpaio enacted or enforced a policy, custom, or practice that resulted in the

14

denial of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. Plaintiff also has not alleged facts to support that

15

Arpaio directly violated his constitutional rights or that Arpaio was aware that Plaintiff’s

16

rights were being violated but failed to act. For that reason, Plaintiff fails to state a claim

17

against Arpaio.

18

B.

19

Plaintiff sues the members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, but he

20

alleges no facts against any Board member in his or her individual capacity. When

21

individuals, such as members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, are sued in an

22

official capacity, the real party in interest is the entity of which the members are agents.

23

Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-66 (1985) (quoting Monell, 436 U.S. at 690 n.55).

24

In this case, that entity is Maricopa County. As discussed above, the actions of individuals

25

may support municipal liability only if a claimed injury resulted pursuant to an official policy

26

or custom of the municipality. Botello v. Gammick, 413 F.3d 971, 978-79 (9th Cir. 2005);

27

Cortez, 294 F.3d at 1188. For that reason, a municipality may not be sued solely because an

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff fails to allege any facts against Arpaio. Plaintiff has not alleged facts to

injury was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442

Supervisors Brock, Stapley, Kunasek, Wilson, and Wilcox

-4-

1

F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). Rather, the municipality is liable only when the execution

2

of its policy or custom inflicts the constitutional injury. Id.; Miranda v. City of Cornelius,

3

429 F.3d 858, 868 (9th Cir. 2005). As stated by the Ninth Circuit:

13

There are three ways to meet the policy, practice, or custom requirement for
municipal liability under § 1983: (1) the plaintiff may prove that a public
entity employee committed the alleged constitutional violation pursuant to a
formal policy or a longstanding practice or custom, which constitutes the
standard operating procedure of the local government entity; (2) the plaintiff
may establish that the individual who committed the constitutional tort was an
official with “final policy-making authority” and that the challenged action
itself thus constituted an act of official government policy; or (3) the plaintiff
may prove that an official with final policy-making authority ratified a
subordinate’s unconstitutional decision or action .... An unconstitutional
policy need not be formal or written to create municipal liability under § 1983;
however, it must be so permanent and well settled as to constitute a custom or
usage with the force of law. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144,
167-68, ... (1970).
Furthermore, “[p]roof of a single incident of
unconstitutional activity is not sufficient to impose liability under Monell,
unless proof of the incident includes proof that it was caused by an existing,
unconstitutional municipal policy, which policy can be attributed to a
municipal policy maker.” Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 823-24, ...
(1985).

14

Avalos v. Baca, 596 F.3d 583, 587-88 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Avalos v. Baca, 517 F.

15

Supp.2d 1156, 1162 (C.D. Cal. 2007)). As stated above, a plaintiff cannot state a § 1983

16

claim against a municipal defendant unless he alleges that the municipal defendant

17

maintained a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury and explains how

18

such policy or custom caused his injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir.

19

2006).

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

20

As noted above, Plaintiff does not allege facts to support that any of the Supervisors

21

violated his constitutional rights in their individual capacities. Plaintiff has not otherwise

22

alleged facts to support that he was injured as a result of a municipal policy or custom.

23

Plaintiff thus fails to state a claim against the Board of Supervisors or Maricopa County and

24

the Supervisors will be dismissed.

25
26

Plaintiff designates his claim as one for the denial of basic necessities based on

27

unsanitary conditions of his cell and the denial of cleaning supplies. The Court construes

28
JDDL-K

C.

Basic Necessities

Plaintiff’s claims as one challenging his conditions of confinement, specifically sanitation.
-5-

1

A prison inmate’s claim for unconstitutional conditions of confinement arises under

2

the Eighth Amendment, Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979), while a pretrial detainee’s

3

claim for unconstitutional conditions arises under the Fourteenth Amendment, Frost v.

4

Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998). Nevertheless, the same standard is applied. See

5

Frost, 152 F.3d at 1128. To state a claim for unconstitutional conditions, a plaintiff must

6

allege an objectively “sufficiently serious” deprivation that results in the denial of "the

7

minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834

8

(1994); Allen v. Sakai, 48 F.3d 1082, 1087 (9th Cir. 1994); see Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-

9

Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2002). That is, a plaintiff must allege facts

10

supporting that he is incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm. Farmer,

11

511 U.S. at 834. Only deprivations denying the minimal civilized measure of life’s

12

necessities are sufficiently grave for an Eighth Amendment violation. Johnson v. Lewis, 217

13

F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2000) (quotation omitted). These are “deprivations of essential food,

14

medical care, or sanitation” or “other conditions intolerable for prison confinement.” Rhodes

15

v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 348 (1981). Whether a condition of confinement rises to the

16

level of a constitutional violation may depend, in part, on the duration of an inmate’s

17

exposure to that condition. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th Cir. 1996). “The more

18

basic the need, the shorter the time it can be withheld.” Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1287,

19

1259 (9th Cir. 1982).

20

In addition to alleging facts to support that he is confined in conditions posing a

21

substantial risk of harm, a plaintiff must also allege facts to support that a defendant had a

22

“sufficiently culpable state of mind,” i.e., that the official acted with deliberate indifference

23

to inmate health or safety.

24

indifference” in the prison context, the Supreme Court has imposed a subjective test: “the

25

official must both be aware of the facts from which the inference could be drawn that a

26

substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference.” Id. A plaintiff

27

must also allege how he was injured by the alleged unconstitutional conditions. See, e.g.,

See Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837.

28
JDDL-K

-6-

In defining “deliberate

1

Lewis, 518 U.S. at 349 (doctrine of standing requires that claimant have suffered or will

2

imminently suffer actual harm).

3

Plaintiff alleges that on March 23, 2012, he was placed in an “unhealthy living”

4

environment and was denied cleaning supplies by unidentified staff members. Plaintiff fails

5

to allege facts to support the severity of his conditions or that he was subjected to such

6

conditions for more than one night. Thus, he fails to allege facts to support that the

7

conditions in his cell rose to the level of a constitutional violation. Plaintiff also fails to

8

allege from whom, how, and when he requested cleaning supplies. Further, Plaintiff fails to

9

allege facts to support that the Defendants, or anyone else, acted with deliberate indifference

10

to his conditions of confinement. For these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for

11

unconstitutional conditions of confinement.

12

IV.

Leave to Amend

13

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for

14

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may

15

submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of

16

Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second amended complaint.

17

If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the second amended

18

complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.

19

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second

20

Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

21

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

22

Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim

23

per count.

24
25

Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v.

26

Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will

27

treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d

28
JDDL-K

A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First Amended

at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or First Amended
-7-

1

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a second amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814

2

F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

3

V.

Warnings

4

A.

5

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

6

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

7

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

8

in dismissal of this action.

9

B.

Release

Address Changes

10

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

11

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

12

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

13

action.

14

C.

Copies

15

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See

16

LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice

17

to Plaintiff.

18
19

Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim,

20

if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in

21

this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C.

22

§ 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal

23

a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more

24

prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal

25

in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,

26

malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is

27

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

28
JDDL-K

D.

/

/

Possible “Strike”

/
-8-

1

E.

2

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

3

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

4

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

5

Court).

6

IT IS ORDERED:

7

(1)

Possible Dismissal

The First Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc.

8

9.) Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint

9

in compliance with this Order.

10

(2)

If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk

11

of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with

12

prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

13
14
15

(3)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 9th day of July, 2012.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

-9-

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6