Jose v. Thomas et al
Filing
5
ORDER (Service Packet) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee. The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Thomas, Griego, Meiner, and Jinbo. Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/2/2012. (KMG)
1
WO
MDR
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Ronald N. Jose,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Todd Thomas, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 12-792-PHX-GMS (SPL)
ORDER
15
16
Plaintiff Ronald N. Jose, who is confined in the Corrections Corporation of America’s
17
Saguaro Correctional Center (CCA-SCC) in Eloy, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights
18
Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma
19
Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will order Defendants to answer the Complaint.
20
I.
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
21
22
§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
23
The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory
24
fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time
25
the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a
26
separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees
27
TERMPSREF
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.
according to the statutory formula.
28
1
II.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
2
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against
3
a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
4
§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised
5
claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may
6
be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
7
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
8
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
9
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not
10
demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-
11
unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
12
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory
13
statements, do not suffice.” Id.
14
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
15
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
16
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content
17
that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the
18
misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for
19
relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial
20
experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual
21
allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there
22
are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.
23
24
must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th
25
Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards
26
than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,
27
94 (2007) (per curiam)).
28
TERMPSREF
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts
....
-2-
1
III.
Complaint
2
In his two-count Complaint, Plaintiff sues the following Defendants: CCA-SCC
3
Warden Todd Thomas, Assistant Warden Ben Griego, Assistant Security Chief Sean Meiner,
4
and Hawaii Department of Public Safety Contract Monitor Scott Jinbo.
5
In Count One, Plaintiff alleges a violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process
6
rights. He claims that Defendant Griego placed Plaintiff in segregation in October 2008;
7
there was no legitimate reason for the placement; Plaintiff was not given written notice of
8
the reason for placement or a hearing within seven days; no periodic review was done for
9
years; when periodic reviews were done, the reasons for keeping Plaintiff in segregation were
10
vague and used boilerplate language; and Plaintiff remains in segregation. Plaintiff also
11
contends that the criteria for placement is overbroad and inmates cannot determine “what
12
behavior would result in release or when release is.”
13
Plaintiff contends that the conditions in segregation create an atypical and significant
14
hardship and that Defendants Thomas and Jinbo are responsible for “all conditions and
15
placement in segregation.” He claims he is in the most restrictive housing in the prison: he
16
is locked down 23-24 hours per day in a cell that is illuminated 24-hours per day; he is only
17
allowed one library book and three showers per week; his meals are served in his cell, which
18
is designed to prevent communication with other inmates; he is not permitted food from the
19
commissary or over-the-counter medical items; his property is limited to two shirts and two
20
pairs of boxers, a uniform, and shower shoes; he is only allowed one 10-minute phone call
21
every 30 days; there are no educational or vocational classes, religious services, cultural
22
activities, work, or hobby crafts; he has no window to see outside; and he is not allowed a
23
television or radio.
24
He also claims that he was told that the only way out of segregation was to participate
25
in the Special Housing Incentive Program (SHIP), but under the contract between CCA-SCC
26
and the State of Hawaii, he cannot be forced to participate in the SHIP program.
27
28
TERMPSREF
In Count Two, Plaintiff alleges that his placement in segregation was retaliation, in
violation of the First Amendment, for exercising his right to associate with a kitchen staff
-3-
1
member. He claims the association did not create a threat to institutional security or violate
2
any institutional rules. Plaintiff claims that Defendant Meiner informed Plaintiff that he
3
would have to complete the SHIP program, but Plaintiff refused because he did not meet the
4
criteria for that program and was not required to participate in the program. He asserts that
5
in retaliation for Plaintiff exercising his right to association and to chill Plaintiff from
6
exercising that right, Defendant Meiner “wrote Plaintiff up” for refusing to participate in the
7
SHIP program. Plaintiff contends that Defendants Thomas, Griego, and Jinbo “all agreed
8
with this false misconduct to chill Plaintiff from exercising his right to freedom of
9
association.
10
Plaintiff claims that he has been in segregation for years and that, as a result, he has
11
been denied parole and placement in a work release program. In his Request for Relief,
12
Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages.
13
Liberally construed, Plaintiff has stated claims for relief in Counts One and Two. The
14
Court will require Defendants to answer the Complaint.
15
IV.
Warnings
16
A.
Release
17
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.
18
Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay
19
the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result
20
in dismissal of this action.
21
B.
Address Changes
22
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule
23
83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other
24
relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this
25
action.
26
27
Plaintiff must serve Defendants, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a copy
28
TERMPSREF
C.
Copies
of every document that he files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include a certificate
-4-
1
stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Also, Plaintiff must submit
2
an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply
3
may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Plaintiff.
4
D.
5
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these
6
warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet,
7
963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to
8
comply with any order of the Court).
9
Possible Dismissal
IT IS ORDERED:
10
(1)
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.
11
(2)
As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,
12
13
Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.
(3)
The Clerk of Court must send Plaintiff a service packet including the
14
Complaint (Doc. 1), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for
15
Defendants Thomas, Griego, Meiner, and Jinbo.
16
(4)
Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court
17
within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. The United States Marshal will not provide
18
service of process if Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order.
19
(5)
If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or
20
complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 120 days of the
21
filing of the Complaint or within 60 days of the filing of this Order, whichever is later, the
22
action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv
23
16.2(b)(2)(B)(i).
24
(6)
25
26
The United States Marshal must retain the Summons, a copy of the Complaint,
and a copy of this Order for future use.
(7)
The United States Marshal must notify Defendants of the commencement of
27
28
TERMPSREF
this action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice to Defendants must include a copy of this Order. The
-5-
1
Marshal must immediately file signed waivers of service of the summons. If a waiver
2
of service of summons is returned as undeliverable or is not returned by a Defendant
3
within 30 days from the date the request for waiver was sent by the Marshal, the
4
Marshal must:
5
(a) personally serve copies of the Summons, Complaint, and this Order upon
6
Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and
7
(b) within 10 days after personal service is effected, file the return of service
8
for Defendant, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of service of the
9
summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service upon Defendant.
10
The costs of service must be enumerated on the return of service form (USM-285) and
11
must include the costs incurred by the Marshal for photocopying additional copies of
12
the Summons, Complaint, or this Order and for preparing new process receipt and
13
return forms (USM-285), if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the
14
personally served Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil
15
Procedure, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.
16
(8)
17
A Defendant who agrees to waive service of the Summons and Complaint
must return the signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, not the Plaintiff.
18
(9)
Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate
19
motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal
20
Rules of Civil Procedure.
21
(10)
Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose
22
23
does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed.
24
....
25
....
26
....
27
....
28
TERMPSREF
behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper that
....
-6-
1
(11)
This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan pursuant to Rules
2
72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized
3
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
4
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2012.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TERMPSREF
-7-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?