Geiss v. Sara Lee Fresh Incorporated et al

Filing 107

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED denying as moot Gillespie Shields & Durrant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions 103 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Motion to File Exhibits A-E to Gillespie Shields & Durrant's Motion for Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions Under Seal 104 (see attached Order for details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/10/14.(MAW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Thomas P. Geiss, No. CV-12-00797-PHX-JAT Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Sara Lee Fresh Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court are Gillespie Shields & Durrant’s (“GSD”) Motion for 15 Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions (Doc. 103) and Motion to File Exhibits A-E to 16 Gillespie Shields & Durrant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions Under 17 Seal (Doc. 104). 18 GSD’s motion seeks relief from the Court’s earlier order awarding sanctions in the 19 form of attorneys’ fees against GSD. See (Doc. 63) (awarding $6,913.35). The parties 20 have settled the case. (Doc. 101). Plaintiff has notified the Court that the award of 21 attorneys’ fees has been forgiven pursuant to the settlement. 22 Accordingly, 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 1 2 IT IS ORDERED denying as moot Gillespie Shields & Durrant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions (Doc. 103). 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Motion to File Exhibits A-E to 4 Gillespie Shields & Durrant’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order for Sanctions Under 5 Seal (Doc. 104). 6 Dated this 10th day of September, 2014. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?