Coach Incorporated et al v. Realeza Michoacana LLC et al

Filing 26

ORDER pursuant to 24 Stipulation of Dismissal : that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate defendant Realeza Michoacana, LLC from this action. That the Scheduling Conference set for October 15, 2012 is vacated in light of Plaintiffs' Not ice of Settlement (Doc. 25) regarding the remaining defendants. That a status hearing regarding the effectuation of the settlement shall be held on November 19, 2012, at 11:30 a.m., in Courtroom 601, to be automatically vacated upon the prior filing of a stipulation for dismissal. All future documents filed with the Court must comply with the caption capitalization requirement of LRCiv 7.1(a)(3). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/10/12. (DMT)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10

Coach, Inc., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

11
12
13
14

vs.
Realeza Michoacana, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-12-00889-PHX-PGR

ORDER

15
16

The parties having filed a Stipulation for Dismissal as to Defendant Realeza

17

Michoacana, LLC Only (Doc. 24) which is sufficient to automatically effectuate the

18

dismissal with prejudice of all claims against defendant Realeza Michoacana, LLC

19

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) without the necessity of a court order, Eitel

20

v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 and n.4 (9th Cir.1986),

21
22

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall terminate defendant Realeza
Michoacana, LLC from this action.

23

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for

24

October 15, 2012 is vacated in light of Plaintiffs’ Notice of Settlement (Doc. 25)

25

regarding the remaining defendants.

26

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status hearing regarding the effectuation

2

of the settlement shall be held on Monday, November 19, 2012, at 11:30 a.m., in

3

Courtroom 601, to be automatically vacated upon the prior filing of a stipulation for

4

dismissal.

5
6
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all future documents filed with the Court must
comply with the caption capitalization requirement of LRCiv 7.1(a)(3).
DATED this 10th day of October, 2012.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-2-