Reyes v. Coehn et al
Filing
5
ORDER denying as moot 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/17/12.(TLJ)
1
WO
MDR
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Rafael Franco Reyes,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
Warden Brian Coehn, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 12-1010-PHX-GMS (LOA)
ORDER
15
16
Plaintiff Rafael Franco Reyes, who is confined in the Corrections Corporation of
17
America’s Florence Correctional Center in Florence, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights
18
Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma
19
Pauperis (Doc. 2). Both the Complaint and the Application to Proceed are identical to the
20
Complaint and Application to Proceed that Plaintiff filed in Reyes v. Coehn, 12-CV-986-
21
PHX-GMS (LOA).
22
It appears that Plaintiff mailed the same documents to both the Tucson and Phoenix
23
courthouses. Because the lawsuit involves events that occurred in Pinal County, this case
24
belongs in the Phoenix Division and the Clerk of Court transferred to the Phoenix Division
25
those documents Plaintiff mailed to the Tucson Division. See Local Rules of Civil Procedure
26
5.1(a) and 77.1. Those documents were filed here as Reyes v. Coehn, 12-CV-986-PHX-
27
GMS (LOA). When the documents Plaintiff mailed to the Phoenix Division arrived several
28
days later, the Clerk of Court filed them as 12-CV-1010-PHX-GMS (LOA).
1
2
Because this action is duplicative of 12-CV-986-PHX-GMS (LOA), the Court will
dismiss this action.1.
3
IT IS ORDERED:
4
(1)
5
Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.
(2)
6
7
8
The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice as duplicative. The
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied as
moot.
DATED this 17th day of May, 2012.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Reyes v. Coehn, 12-CV-986-PHX-GMS (LOA), remains open and will be reviewed
by the Court in due course.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?