Van DeCasteele #271090 v. Maricopa, County of et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 7 Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot 9 Plaintiff's Motion to order Maricopa County Sheriff's Office to produce Plaintiff's inmate account statement. The Compliant is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/28/12.(LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9
10
11
12

Brent Daniel Van DeCasteele,

13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16

Maricopa County, et al.,

17
Defendants.
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 12-1158-PHX-RCB (BSB)
ORDER

19

Plaintiff Brent Daniel Van DeCasteele, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison

20

Complex-Eyman, Cook Unit, in Florence, Arizona, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint

21

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff

22

has also filed a motion to compel the Maricopa County Jail to provide an inmate trust

23

account statement for the period during which he was held there. (Doc. 9.) The Court will

24

grant Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motion to compel production

25

of his inmate account statement as moot. The Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave

26

to amend.

27

I.

28
JDDL-K

Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.

1

§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

2

The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory

3

fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time

4

the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a

5

separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees

6

according to the statutory formula.

7

II.

Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints

8

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against

9

a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.

10

§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised

11

claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may

12

be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

13

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).

14

A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the

15

pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not

16

demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-

17

unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).

18

“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory

19

statements, do not suffice.” Id.

20
21

claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,

22

550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content

23

that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the

24

misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for

25

relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial

26

experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual

27

allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there

28
JDDL-K

“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a

are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.
-2-

1

But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts

2

must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th

3

Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards

4

than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,

5

94 (2007) (per curiam)).

6

If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,

7

a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the

8

action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court

9

should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would

10

undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,

11

231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was

12

required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

13

for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment,

14

the Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.

15

III.

Complaint

16

Plaintiff alleges three counts for denial of constitutionally adequate medical care and

17

threats to safety. Plaintiff sues Maricopa County and Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M.

18

Arpaio. Plaintiff seeks compensatory relief.

19
20

in the Lower Buckeye Jail and was assigned to a top bunk without a guardrail or ladder to

21

climb down from the bunk. As Plaintiff was climbing down from the bunk, he fell and

22

landed on a steel table that was bolted to the wall. Plaintiff’s back was x-rayed and the x-

23

rays showed that he had broken the T-10 and T-11 vertebra. Nevertheless, Plaintiff was left

24

lying in pain for four days before he was rushed to Maricopa County Hospital for the broken

25

vertebra and internal bleeding. Plaintiff was hospitalized for three days. Plaintiff suffered

26

severe pain and sustained nerve damage in his back. Plaintiff asserts that, “Doctors neglected

27

to see fractures on exrays and did not[h]ing to help me and causing sever pain and nerve

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff alleges the following facts in his Complaint: at some point, Plaintiff was held

damage in back.” (Doc. 1 at 5.)
-3-

1

IV.

Failure to State a Claim

2

A plaintiff may seek relief for violations of his federal constitutional or statutory rights

3

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts

4

supporting that (1) the conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting

5

under the color of state law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or

6

statutory right. Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). In addition, a

7

plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a particular

8

defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the conduct of that

9

defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).

10

A.

Maricopa County

11

Plaintiff sues Maricopa County. A municipality, such as a city or county, is a

12

“person” for purposes of § 1983 and may be sued. See Leatherman v. Tarrant County

13

Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 166 (1993); Monell v. Dep’t of

14

Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978). To state a claim against a municipality under § 1983,

15

a plaintiff must allege facts to support that his constitutional rights were violated pursuant

16

to a policy or custom of the municipality. Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186,

17

1188 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91); Thompson v. City of Los Angeles,

18

885 F.2d 1439, 1443 (9th Cir. 1989)). A municipality may not be sued solely because an

19

injury was inflicted by one of its employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442

20

F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, a § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant

21

“cannot succeed as a matter of law” unless a plaintiff: (1) contends that the municipal

22

defendant maintains a policy or custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury; and (2)

23

explains how such policy or custom caused the plaintiff’s injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435

24

F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant to

25

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)).

26
27

custom that resulted in the violation of Plaintiff’s federal constitutional rights. He also fails

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that Maricopa County maintained a policy or

to allege facts to support that any constitutional injury was the result of a municipal policy
-4-

1

or custom. Accordingly, Plaintiff also fails to state a claim against Maricopa County and it

2

will be dismissed.

3

B.

Sheriff Arpaio

4

Plaintiff also sues Sheriff Arpaio. Although Arpaio may properly be sued for

5

constitutional violations, Plaintiff fails to state a claim against him. “A plaintiff must allege

6

facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the

7

deprivation of his civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998).

8

For an individual to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege that the official

9

acted as a result of a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez, 294 F.3d at 1188. Further,

10

there is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a defendant’s position as the

11

supervisor of a someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s constitutional rights does not

12

make him liable. Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir.

13

1989). A supervisor in his individual capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations

14

of his subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the

15

violations and failed to act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045.

16

Plaintiff fails to allege any facts against Arpaio. Plaintiff does not allege that Arpaio

17

directly violated his constitutional rights. He also fails to allege facts to support that

18

Plaintiff’s constitutional rights were violated as a result of a policy or custom promulgated

19

or endorsed by Arpaio. Accordingly, Arpaio will also be dismissed.

20
21

Plaintiff designates Counts I and III as claims for constitutionally inadequate medical

22

care. Not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a

23

violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a

24

plaintiff must show that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical

25

needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429

26

U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating

27

that failure to treat the condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary

28
JDDL-K

C.

Medical Care

and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent.
-5-

1

Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 (quotations omitted).

2

“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,

3

1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know

4

of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts

5

from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and

6

he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Deliberate

7

indifference in the medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond

8

to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439

9

F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally

10

denies, delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to

11

the prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.

12

Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due

13

care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross

14

negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.”

15

Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter

16

Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or

17

“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does

18

not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.

19

Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is

20

insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley

21

v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference

22

must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction

23

of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.

Clement v. California Dep’t of

24
25

allege when he fell and injured his back. Further, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support

26

when, who, and how he notified any jail personnel of his injury. He does not allege facts to

27

support that any jail official knew of his injuries but disregarded Plaintiff’s serious medical

28
JDDL-K

Plaintiff sufficiently alleges that he had a serious medical need. However, he fails to

need. Further, it is unclear when he was x-rayed, i.e., the day he fell or sometime later. It
-6-

1

is also unclear whether there was a delay in being initially seen for his injuries or whether

2

he was left in his cell after x-rays had been taken. Plaintiff must allege facts to support that

3

some jail officer or medical personnel knew, or should have known, that Plaintiff was

4

seriously injured and that such officer or medical personnel failed to act to treat or alleviate

5

Plaintiff’s medical condition. Plaintiff must also name such jail officer or medical personnel

6

as a defendant. Because Plaintiff has neither named a jail officer or medical personnel who

7

acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, Plaintiff fails to state a claim

8

in Counts I or III.

9

D.

Threat to Safety

10

Plaintiff characterizes the absence of a ladder to access his bunk as a threat to safety.

11

To state a claim under § 1983 for failure to protect or threats to safety, an inmate must allege

12

facts to support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm

13

and that prison officials were “deliberately indifferent” to those risks. Farmer v. Brennan,

14

511 U.S. 825, 832-33 (1994). To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must

15

allege facts to support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate

16

safety. Id. at 837. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the

17

inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also

18

[have] draw[n] the inference.” Id.

19

Plaintiff appears to contend that the absence of a ladder posed a threat to his safety

20

and that he fell and injured himself because of the absence of a ladder.1 Plaintiff fails to

21

allege facts to support that the absence of a ladder posed a substantial threat to his safety.

22

Moreover, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to support that anyone knew that the failure to provide

23

ladders posed a substantial threat to his safety but failed to act to alleviate that threat.

24

Further, Plaintiff fails to allege facts to connect either Defendant, or anyone else, to the

25

asserted threat to his safety. For all of these reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim for threat

26

to safety.

27

...

28
1

JDDL-K

The presence of a ladder does not eliminate the possibility of a fall.
-7-

1

V.

Leave to Amend

2

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state

3

a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first

4

amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail

5

Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails

6

to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this

7

action without further notice to Plaintiff.

8

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First

9

Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its

10

entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original

11

Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

12

A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963

13

F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,

14

1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as

15

nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original

16

complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d

17

565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

18

VI.

Warnings

19

A.

Release

20

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.

21

Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay

22

the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result

23

in dismissal of this action.

24
25

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule

26

83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other

27

relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this

28
JDDL-K

B.

Address Changes

action.
-8-

1

C.

2

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails

3

to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the

4

dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

5

Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil

6

judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior

7

occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a

8

court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,

9

or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under

10

Possible “Strike”

imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

11

D.

Possible Dismissal

12

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these

13

warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at

14

1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the

15

Court).

16

IT IS ORDERED:

17

(1)

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 7.)

18

(2)

As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,

19
20
21
22

Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.
(3)

Plaintiff’s motion to order Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office to produce

Plaintiff’s inmate account statement is denied as moot. (Doc. 9.)
(4)

The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has

23

30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with

24

this Order.

25

(5)

If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of

26

Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice

27

that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

28
JDDL-K

(6)

The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil
-9-

1
2

rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 28th day of August, 2012.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K

- 10 -

Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:

Revised 3/9/07

1

Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119

Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2

12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.

FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.

4

Name and Prisoner/Booking Number

Place of Confinement

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip Code

(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

(Full Name of Plaintiff)

Plaintiff,
vs.

(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)

(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).

G

Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.

)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint

A. JURISDICTION
1.

2.

This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:

.

Institution/city where violation occurred:

.

Revised 3/9/07

1

550/555

B. DEFENDANTS
1.

Name of first Defendant:
at

. The first Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

2.

(Institution)

Name of second Defendant:
at

. The second Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

3.

(Institution)

Name of third Defendant:
at

. The third Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

4.

(Institution)

Name of fourth Defendant:
at

. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.

(Position and Title)

(Institution)

If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.

C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.

Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?

2.

If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?

G Yes

G No

. Describe the previous lawsuits:

a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)

.
.

If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.

2

D. CAUSE OF ACTION

1.

COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3

1.

COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4

1.

COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.

2.

Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:

.

3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.

.
4.

Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).

.
5.

Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.

If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.

5

E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:

.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE

SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF

(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)

(Signature of attorney, if any)

(Attorney’s address & telephone number)

ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.

6