Van DeCasteele #271090 v. Maricopa, County of et al
Filing
14
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to submit is denied to the extent that any relief is sought as moot. (Doc. 13.). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/31/12. (LSP)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16
No. CV 12-1158-PHX-RCB (BSB)
Brent Daniel Van DeCasteele,
Maricopa County, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
19
20
21
Complex-Eyman, Cook Unit, in Florence, Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint
22
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an Order
23
filed on August 29, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
24
(Doc. 11.) The same day, Plaintiff filed a motion to submit an inmate trust account
25
statement. (Doc. 13.) Because Plaintiff previously provided his inmate trust account
26
statement, doc. 8, and the Court has already granted him leave to proceed in forma pauperis,
27
doc. 11, the Court will deny the motion to submit to the extent that any relief is sought
28
JDDL-K
Plaintiff Brent Daniel Van DeCasteele, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison
therein.
1
Warnings
2
A.
Release
3
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.
4
Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay
5
the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result
6
in dismissal of this action.
7
B.
Address Changes
8
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule
9
83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other
10
relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this
11
action.
12
C.
Possible “Strike”
13
Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails
14
to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the
15
dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
16
Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil
17
judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior
18
occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a
19
court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious,
20
or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under
21
imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
22
23
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these
24
warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at
25
1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the
26
Court).
27
/
/
/
28
JDDL-K
D.
Possible Dismissal
/
/
/
-2-
1
2
3
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to submit is denied to the extent that any
relief is sought as moot. (Doc. 13.)
DATED this 31st day of August, 2012.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?