G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Erdem et al

Filing 28

ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 26 ) as specified above; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in the amount of $23,200. Plaintiff may move for attorneys' fees as provided in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/19/2013.(KMG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC,

10
11

Plaintiff,

No. CV-12-01283-PHX-JAT
ORDER

v.

12
13

Mustafa Erdem, Mohammed F. Ali, M
Square Business Ventures, LLC,

14
15
16
17

Defendants.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 26).
The Court now rules on the Motion.

18

The Clerk of the Court entered default on January 24, 2013. (Doc. 25). Plaintiff

19

now seeks default judgment in the amount of $111,200.00. Plaintiff’s damages are

20

broken down into three categories: 1) statutory damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §

21

605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II); 2) enhanced damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii); and 3)

22

conversion damages pursuant to Arizona law. Plaintiff seeks $10,000, $100,000, and

23

$1,200, in the respective categories.

24

Statutory damages are appropriate when actual damages cannot be easily proven.

25

J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Canedo, No. C 09-01488 PJH, 2009 WL 4572740, *5 (N.D.

26

Cal. 2009). “Under § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), an aggrieved party may recover ‘a sum not less

27

than $1,000 or more than $10,000, as the court considers just’ for each violation.” J & J

28

Sports Prods. Inc. v. Miramontes, No. CV-10-02345-PHX-FJM, 2011 WL 892350, at *2

1

(D. Ariz. March 14, 2011) (internal citation omitted). Further, “[a]n award of damages

2

should deter future conduct but not destroy the business.” Id. (quoting Kingvision Pay–

3

Per–View v. Lake Alice Bar, 168 F.3d 347, 360 (9th Cir. 2009)).

4

In awarding statutory damages, courts in this district have considered factors such

5

as the maximum capacity of the commercial establishment, the total number of patrons

6

present at the time of the unauthorized showing, and the amount defendant would have

7

paid if it had purchased the rights to show the broadcast. See, e.g., id.

8

In this case, Defendants’ establishment had a maximum of 31 patrons at the time

9

the boxing match was broadcast and had a maximum capacity of 50 patrons. (Doc. 26-3

10

at 2-3).1 Based on the size of the establishment and number of patrons present, the Court

11

finds a $2,000 penalty to be appropriate and will award $2,000 under §

12

605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II).

13

Further, “[e]nhanced damages are awarded upon a showing that defendant acted

14

willfully and for the purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage or private

15

financial gain. Under § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii), the court may award up to $100,000 . . .”

16

Miramontes, 2011 WL 892350, *2. In deciding whether to award enhanced damages,

17

Courts generally consider factors such as repeat violations,
substantial unlawful monetary gains, significant actual
damages to plaintiff, advertising, cover charges, or charging
premium menu and drink prices. See Kingvision Pay–Per–
View v. Gutierrez, 544 F.Supp.2d 1179, 1185 (D. Colo.
2008). Some courts find the mere unauthorized showing of a
program sufficient to award enhanced damages because given
the low probability of accidentally showing it, it must have
been done willfully and for profit. See Entertainment By J &
J, Inc. v. Al–Waha Enter., Inc., 219 F.Supp.2d 769, 776 (S.D.
Tex. 2002).

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Id.

26
27
28

1

Because the Court awards Plaintiff actual damages with regard to its conversion
claim, the Court has not taken the actual damages incurred by Plaintiff into account when
determining statutory damages to avoid duplicative recovery.
-2-

1

Here, there is no evidence of substantial unlawful monetary gains, advertising,

2

cover charges, or premium drink or menu prices. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants’

3

showing of the fight was willful and that allegation is accepted as true for purposes of

4

default judgment. (Doc. 1 at 6, ¶ 25). Plaintiff has submitted evidence that a few other

5

cases have been brought against this establishment. (Doc. 26-4). Thus, some measure of

6

enhanced damages is appropriate, but not the statutory maximum of $100,000 that

7

Plaintiff seeks. Because Plaintiff has shown willfulness and one aggravating factor, the

8

Court finds $20,000 in enhanced damages to be appropriate. See Joe Hand Promotions,

9

Inc. v. Coen, No. CV 11-2531-PHX-JAT, 2012 WL 2919710, *2 (D. Ariz. July 17, 2012)

10

(awarding $10,000 in enhanced damages for deterrence purposes).

11

Plaintiff also requests summary judgment on its conversion claim. “Conversion is

12

any act of dominion wrongfully asserted over another’s personal property in denial of or

13

inconsistent with his rights therein.”

14

1225 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976). Under Arizona law, “the measure of conversion damages

15

includes not only the value of the property taken, but also other damage suffered because

16

of the wrongful detention or deprivation of the property.” Collins v. First Fin. Servs.,

17

Inc., 815 P.2d 411, 413 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991).

Scott v. Allstate Ins. Co., 553 P.2d 1221,

18

Here, Plaintiff has shown that it had exclusive commercial distribution rights over

19

the Program and, if Defendants had obtained a sublicense to broadcast the program in an

20

establishment with a maximum fire code occupancy of 50 persons, the commercial

21

sublicense fee would have been $1,200. (Doc. 27 at 11). Accordingly, Plaintiff is

22

entitled to damages on its conversion claim in the amount of $1,200, the amount Plaintiff

23

would have been paid had Defendants lawfully paid for the right to show the program.

24

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 26) as

25

specified above; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and

26

against Defendants in the amount of $23,200. Plaintiff may move for attorneys’ fees as

27
28

-3-

1
2

provided in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure.2
Dated this 19th day of September, 2013.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Statutory and Enhanced Damages arise under Court I of the Complaint.
Conversion Damages arise under Count III of the Complaint. Count II of the Complaint
seeks $60,000 under 47 U.S.C. § 553. Because the motion for default judgment does not
mention this claim at all, the Court deems it to be dismissed with prejudice with Plaintiff
to take nothing on Count II.
-4-