Ritchie v. Van Ru Credit Corporation
Filing
100
FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT. The Court finds that the Lawsuit satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment. The Settlement Agreement shall be deemed incorporated herein, and the proposed settlement are finally approved and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms and provisions thereof, except as amended by any order issued by this Court. Van Ru shall establish a $2,300,000 Settlement Fund. Plaintiff, Nivea Ritchie, shall receive the sum of $12,000. T he Lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice in all respects, with the Court specifically retaining jurisdiction to award attorneys' fees, costs, expenses, and disbursements to Class Counsel. Plaintiff's request for an award of attorney s' fees of 28% of the Settlement Fund, or $644,000.00, is approved. Plaintiff's request for a reimbursement of litigation expenses of $20,847.52 is approved. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 7/30/2014. (See Order for details)(ALS)
1
WO
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
4
5
6
7
8
9
Nivea Ritchie, on behalf of herself and
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
10
11
12
13
Van Ru Credit Corporation,
Palisades Collection, L.L.C., and
Asta Funding, Inc.
Defendants.
) Case No. 2:12-CV-01714-PHX-SMM
)
) FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
14
On January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed an amended class action complaint
15
16
(hereinafter referred to as the “Lawsuit”) against Van Ru Credit Corporation, Palisades
17
Collection, L.L.C. and Asta Funding, Inc. in the United States District Court for the
18
District of Arizona, Case No. CV-12-1714-PHX-SMM, asserting class claims under the
19
20
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as the “TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. §
21
227, et seq.
22
Van Ru Credit Corporation, Palisades Collection, L.L.C. and Asta Funding, Inc.
23
24
25
26
(“Defendants”) have denied any and all liability alleged in the Lawsuit.
On February 21, 2014, after extensive arms-length negotiations, Plaintiff and
Defendants (hereinafter jointly referred to as the “Parties”) entered into a Class Action
27
28
Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Settlement Agreement”), which is
1
1
2
3
subject to review under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
On February 21, 2014, the Parties filed the Settlement Agreement, along with their
Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement (the “Preliminary Approval
4
5
Motion”).
6
In compliance with the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(D),
7
1453, and 1711-1715, Defendants served written notice of the proposed class settlement
8
on the United States Attorney General and the Attorneys General of all 50 states.
9
10
On March 12, 2014, upon consideration of the Parties’ Preliminary Approval
11
Motion and the record, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary Approval of Class
12
Action Settlement (hereinafter referred to as the “Preliminary Approval Order”).
13
14
Pursuant to the Preliminary Approval Order, the Court, among other things, (i)
15
preliminarily certified (for settlement purposes only) a class of plaintiffs (hereinafter
16
referred to as the “Class Members”) with respect to the claims asserted in the Lawsuit;
17
18
(ii) preliminarily approved the proposed settlement; (iii) appointed Plaintiff Nivea Ritchie
19
as the Class Representative; (iv) appointed Michael L. Greenwald and James L. Davidson
20
of Greenwald Davidson PLLC as Class Counsel; and, (v) set the date and time of the
21
22
23
24
Settlement Approval Hearing.
On July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff filed her Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of
Class Action Settlement (the “Final Approval Motion”).
25
26
27
28
On July 21, 2014, a Final Approval Hearing was held pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
23 to determine whether the Lawsuit satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action
treatment and whether the proposed settlement is fundamentally fair, reasonable,
2
1
2
3
adequate, and in the best interest of the Class Members and should be approved by the
Court.
The Parties now request final certification of the settlement class under Fed. R.
4
5
Civ. P. 23 (b)(3) and final approval of the proposed class action settlement.
6
The Court has read and considered the Settlement Agreement, Motion for Final
7
Approval, and record. All capitalized terms used herein have the meanings defined
8
herein and/or in the Agreement.
9
10
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
11
1.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Lawsuit and over
12
all settling parties hereto.
13
14
15
2.
CLASS MEMBERS – Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3), the Lawsuit is
hereby certified, for settlement purposes only, as a class action on behalf of the following
16
class of plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as the “Class Members”) with respect to the
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
claims asserted in the Lawsuit:
all persons and entities throughout the United States to whom Van Ru made
or caused to be made one or more calls between January 1, 2012 through
May 31, 2012 directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service,
by using an automatic telephone dialing system where Van Ru’s records
show the person or entity’s cellular telephone number was obtained from a
skip trace vendor (the “Class Members”).
25
26
3.
Defendants represent there are approximately 9,042 Class Members.
27
4.
CLASS
28
REPRESENTATIVE
AND
CLASS
COUNSEL
APPOINTMENT – Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, the Court certifies Plaintiff Nivea
3
1
2
3
Ritchie as the Class Representative and Michael L. Greenwald and James L. Davidson of
Greenwald Davidson PLLC as Class Counsel
5.
NOTICES AND CLAIM FORMS – Pursuant to the Court’s Preliminary
4
5
Approval Order, the approved class action notices were mailed. The form and method
6
for notifying the Class Members of the settlement and its terms and conditions was in
7
conformity with this Court’s Preliminary Approval Order and satisfied the requirements
8
of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c)(2)(B) and due process, and constituted the best notice practicable
9
10
under the circumstances. The Court finds that the notice was clearly designed to advise
11
the Class Members of their rights.
12
6.
FINAL CLASS CERTIFICATION – The Court finds that the Lawsuit
13
14
satisfies the applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23,
15
namely:
16
A.
The Class Members are so numerous that joinder of all of them in the
17
Lawsuit is impracticable;
18
19
B.
20
There are questions of law and fact common to the Class Members, which
predominate over any individual questions;
21
22
23
C.
The claims of the Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Class Members;
D.
The Plaintiff and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and
24
protected the interests of all of the Class Members; and
25
26
27
28
E.
Class treatment of these claims will be efficient and manageable, thereby
achieving an appreciable measure of judicial economy, and a class action is
superior to other available methods for a fair and efficient adjudication of
4
this controversy.
1
2
3
7.
The Court finds that the settlement of the Lawsuit, on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement, is in all respects fundamentally fair,
4
5
reasonable, adequate, and in the best interest of the Class Members, especially in light of
6
the benefits to the Class Members; the strength of the Plaintiff’s case; the complexity,
7
expense, and probable duration of further litigation; the risk and delay inherent in
8
possible appeals; the risk of collecting any judgment obtained on behalf of the class; and,
9
10
11
the limited amount of any potential total recovery for the class.
8.
SETTLEMENT TERMS – The Settlement Agreement, which is attached
12
hereto as Exhibit A and shall be deemed incorporated herein, and the proposed
13
14
settlement are finally approved and shall be consummated in accordance with the terms
15
and provisions thereof, except as amended by any order issued by this Court. The
16
material terms of the Settlement Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following:
17
18
19
20
A.
Settlement Fund – Van Ru shall establish a $2,300,000 Settlement Fund
(the “Settlement Fund”).
B.
Deductions - The following shall be deducted from the Settlement Fund
21
22
23
24
before any other distributions are made:
a.
The costs and expenses for the administration of the settlement and
class notice, including expenses necessary to identify class members;
25
26
27
b.
Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs, subject to approval from this
Court and not to exceed 30% of the fund; and
28
5
c.
1
2
3
The Incentive Payment to Nivea Ritchie. Plaintiff, Nivea Ritchie,
shall receive the sum of $12,000 as acknowledgment of her role in prosecuting this case
on behalf of the Class Members.
4
5
C.
Settlement Payment to Class Members - Each Class Member who has
6
submitted a valid and timely claim form with a postmark date no later than 75 days after
7
the Court’s entry of the Order of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall
8
receive a pro rata share of the remainder of the settlement fund. Each settlement check
9
10
will be will be void sixty (60) days after mailing. To the extent that any funds remain in
11
the Settlement Fund after the void date (from uncashed checks or otherwise), these funds
12
will be paid to Van Ru to offset the costs of settlement administration, up to the costs of
13
14
administration.
15
9.
OBJECTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS – The Class Members were given
16
an opportunity to object to the settlement. No Class Member objected to the settlement.
17
18
One Class Member made a valid and timely request for exclusion and is excluded from
19
the class and settlement and is not bound by this order. The identity of such person is:
20
Delittria I. Whitehead.
21
22
23
24
10.
This Order is binding on all Class Members, except Delittria I. Whitehead,
who validly and timely excluded herself from the class.
11.
RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND DISMISSAL OF LAWSUIT – The Class
25
26
27
28
Representative, Class Members, and their successors and assigns are permanently barred
and enjoined from instituting or prosecuting, either individually or as a class, or in any
other capacity, any of the Released Claims against any of the Released Parties, as set
6
1
2
3
forth in the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the release contained in the Settlement
Agreement, the Released Claims – except claims for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses
– are compromised, settled, released, discharged, by virtue of these proceedings and this
4
5
6
7
order.
12.
The Lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice in all respects, with the
Court specifically retaining jurisdiction to award attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and
8
disbursements to Class Counsel.
9
10
11
13.
This Order is not, and shall not be construed as, an admission by
Defendants of any liability or wrongdoing in this or in any other proceeding.
12
14.
The Court hereby retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over the
13
14
Parties and all matters relating to the Lawsuit and/or Settlement Agreement, including the
15
administration, interpretation, construction, effectuation, enforcement, and consummation
16
of the settlement and this order, including the award of attorneys’ fees, costs,
17
18
19
20
disbursements, and expenses to Class Counsel.
15. Plaintiff’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees of 28 percent of the
Settlement Fund, or $644,000.00, is approved.
21
22
.....
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
1
2
3
16. Plaintiff’s request for a reimbursement of litigation expenses of $20,847.52 is
approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
DATED this 30th day of July, 2014.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nivea Ritchie, on behalf of herself
and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Van Ru Credit Corporation,
Palisades Collection, L.L.C., and
Asta Funding, Inc.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV-12-1714-PHX-SMM
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Class Action Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the
“Agreement”), dated February 21, 2014, is entered into between Nivea Ritchie
(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff” or “Class Representative”), individually and on
behalf of the “Class Members” (as defined below), and Van Ru Credit Corporation
(hereinafter referred to as “Van Ru”). This Agreement is intended by Van Ru and
Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the Class Members (hereinafter collectively referred to
as the “Parties”), to fully, finally, and forever resolve, discharge, and settle the “Released
Claims” (as defined below), upon and subject to the terms and conditions contained
herein.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed an amended class action
complaint (hereinafter referred to as the “Lawsuit”) against Van Ru Credit Corporation,
1
Palisades Collection, L.L.C. and Asta Funding, Inc. in the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona, Case No. CV-12-1714-PHX-SMM, asserting putative class
claims arising from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as
the “TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has alleged that Van Ru violated 47 U.S.C. §
227(b)(1)(A)(iii) by utilizing an automatic telephone dialing system and/or an artificial or
prerecorded voice to make or place telephone calls to Plaintiff’s cellular telephone
number and the cellular telephone numbers of the putative class without consent to do so.
WHEREAS, the Parties desire and intend to settle and resolve all of the claims
asserted in the Lawsuit;
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to avoid the expense and uncertainty of litigation;
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that settlement by way of this Agreement is in
their best interest;
WHEREAS, counsel for the Class Members have conducted an evaluation of the
claims to determine how best to serve the interests of the Class Members;
WHEREAS, counsel for the Class Members believe, in view of the costs, risks,
and delays of continued litigation and appeals balanced against the benefits of settlement
to the Class Members, that the class settlement as provided in this Agreement is in the
best interest of the Class Members and is a fair, reasonable, and adequate resolution of
the Lawsuit;
WHEREAS, prior to entering into this Agreement, counsel for the Parties engaged
2
in extensive arms-length negotiations and discovery, including a full day mediation with
the Honorable Wayne Andersen (Ret.);
WHEREAS, the Parties desire and intend to seek court approval of the settlement
of the Lawsuit as set forth in this Agreement and, upon court approval, to seek entry of a
Final Approval Order and subsequently an order dismissing with prejudice the claims of
the Class Members as set forth herein;
WHEREAS, the Parties and their counsel agree to recommend approval of this
Agreement to the Court and to any regulatory authority responding to the proposed
settlement pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (hereinafter referred to as
“CAFA”), Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to undertake all steps necessary to effectuate the
terms and purposes of this Agreement, to secure the Court’s approval of same, and
contemplate that they will oppose any objections to the proposed settlement, including
objections by any regulatory authority after CAFA notices are issued, and oppose any
appeals from any orders of final approval.
WHEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, representations, and warranties
set forth, the Parties stipulate and agree:
1.
DEFINITIONS – The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement:
A.
“Effective Date” shall mean the first date after “Final Order Day” (as
defined below) and after Van Ru fulfills the obligations required under ¶ 22 of this
Agreement.
3
B.
“Final Order Day” shall mean the day upon which the Final Approval
Order becomes “Final.”
The Final Approval Order shall become “Final” upon the
expiration of any available appeal period following entry of the Final Approval Order. If
any appeal is filed from the Final Approval Order, then the Final Order Day shall be the
first date after the conclusion of all appeals, so long as the Final Approval Order is not
reversed or vacated.
C.
“Class Members” shall mean all persons and entities throughout the United
States to whom Van Ru made or caused to be made one or more calls between January1,
2012 and May 31, 2012 directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service, by
using an automatic telephone dialing system where the person or entity’s cellular
telephone number was obtained by Van Ru from a skip trace vendor. The Parties agree
there are 9,042 Class Members, including Plaintiff.
D.
“Released Claims” shall mean any and all claims, causes of action, suits,
obligations, debts, demands, agreements, promises, liabilities, damages, losses,
controversies, costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees of any nature whatsoever, whether
based on any federal law, state law, common law, territorial law, or foreign law right of
action or of any other type or form (whether in contract, tort, or otherwise, including
statutory, common law, property, and equitable claims), between January 1, 2012 through
May 31, 2012, which Plaintiff or Class Members have that arise out of, or are based upon,
the conduct alleged in the Lawsuit – including specifically claims that arise out of or are
related in any way to the use of an “automatic telephone dialing system”, a predictive
4
dialer and/or an “artificial or prerecorded voice” by Van Ru to make “calls” to a cellular
telephone or any service for which the Class Member was charged for the call, (to the
fullest extent that those terms are used, defined or interpreted by the Telephone
Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., relevant regulatory or administrative
promulgations and case law) by or on behalf of the Released Parties in connection with
efforts to contact or attempt to contact Settlement Class Members by or on behalf of the
Released Parties including, but not limited to, claims under or for violations of the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., and any other statutory or
common law claim arising from the use of automatic telephone dialing systems, a
predictive dialer and/or an artificial or prerecorded voice, including any claim under or
for violation of federal or state unfair and deceptive practices statutes, violations of any
federal or state debt collection practices acts (including, but not limited to, the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.), invasion of privacy, conversion,
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, specific performance and/or promissory estoppel,
regardless of whether those claims are known or unknown at the time this Agreement is
entered into, and regardless of any information that may be discovered in future, which
Plaintiff or Class Members have that arise out of, or are based upon, the conduct alleged
in the Lawsuit.
E.
“Released Parties” shall mean Van Ru Credit Corporation; Palisades
Collection, L.L.C.; Asta Funding, Inc. and each of their past, present, and future
directors, officers, employees, partners, principals, agents, underwriters, insurers, co5
insurers, re-insurers, shareholders, attorneys, and any related or affiliated company,
including any parent, subsidiary, predecessor, or successor company, and all assigns,
licensees, divisions, clients, joint ventures, and any entities directly or indirectly involved
in the Lawsuit.
2.
CLASS CERTIFICATION – Concurrent with seeking preliminary approval of the
settlement, counsel for the Parties shall jointly seek certification, pursuant to FED. R. CIV.
P. 23 (b)(3), of a class as defined above in ¶ 1(C).
3.
CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND CLASS COUNSEL APPOINTMENT – For
settlement purposes, and subject to Court approval, Plaintiff, Nivea Ritchie, is appointed
as the Class Representative for the Class Members and Michael L. Greenwald and James
L. Davidson of Greenwald Davidson PLLC, are appointed as counsel for the Class
Members (“Class Counsel”).
4.
ORDER OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL – Within 20 business days after this
Agreement is fully executed, counsel for the Parties shall jointly request that the Court
enter an Order of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement in substantially the
same form attached as Exhibit A.
5.
FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT – If the settlement is approved preliminarily
by the Court, and all other conditions precedent to the settlement have been satisfied,
counsel for the Parties shall jointly request that the Court enter a Final Order and
Judgment in substantially the same form attached as Exhibit B.
6
6.
Upon entry of the Final Order and Judgment, the Parties expressly waive any and
all rights to appeal any orders issued by the Court in connection with the Lawsuit.
7.
Plaintiff and Class Counsel agree that the execution of this Agreement, or any
related documents, the certification of the class, and any other act taken or court paper
filed in furtherance of this Agreement shall not be used to urge that a “litigation class”
pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 23 is appropriate in this case. In the event this settlement is
not approved, Defendants retain any and all rights to object to the maintenance of this
action, or any other action as a class action, and to contest this action, or any other action,
on any other grounds, and Plaintiff retains and all rights to seek certification of a
litigation class that may be different in scope than the settlement class here.,
8.
ADMINISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION PROCESS – A third party class
administrator jointly selected by and agreeable to the parties (“Class Administrator”)
shall administer the settlement and notification of the settlement to the Class Members.
The costs and expenses for the administration of the settlement and class notice,
including all skip tracing work necessary to identify the class members, shall be deducted
from the Settlement Fund as defined below. The Class Administrator will be responsible
for mailing the approved class action notice and settlement checks to the Class Members.
9.
The Class Administrator shall, as expeditiously as possible but not to exceed 30
days from the Court’s entry of the Order of Preliminary Approval of Class Action
Settlement, provide notice of the settlement to the Class Members as follows:
A.
Written Notice – The Class Administrator will send via U.S. mail written
7
notice of the settlement to each Class Member at his or her last known valid address,
address correction requested. Before sending the written notice, the Class Administrator
shall confirm and, if necessary, update the addresses for the Class Members through the
standard methodology it currently uses to update addresses, including attempting to
identify the name and address of each Class Member based on the cellular telephone
number identified for each Class Member. If any notice is returned with a new address,
the Class Administrator will re-mail the notice to the new address and shall update the
Class Member address list with all forwarding addresses. The notice to the Class
Members shall be in substantially the form attached as Exhibit C.
B.
Website Notice – No more than 30 days after the Preliminary Order, the
Claims Administrator shall maintain and administer a dedicated settlement website
(www.________.com) containing class information and related documents, along with
information necessary to file a claim, and an electronic version of the Claim Form
members can download, complete and submit electronically. At a minimum, such
documents shall include the Settlement Agreement and Exhibits, the Notice, the
Preliminary Approval Order, a downloadable Claim Form for anyone wanting to print a
hard copy and mail in the Claim Form, the operative complaint, and when filed, the Final
Approval Order.
C.
CAFA Notice. Defendants shall be responsible for serving the Class Action
Fairness Act (“CAFA”) notice required by 28 U.S.C. § 1715 within 10 days of the filing
of the Preliminary Approval Motion.
8
10.
REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION AND OBJECTIONS – The Class Administrator
shall administer the receipt of any and all requests for exclusion.
11.
Any Class Member who desires to be excluded from the class must send a written
request for exclusion to the Class Administrator with a postmark date no later than 75
days after the Court’s entry of the Order of Preliminary Approval of Class Action
Settlement. The Class Administrator shall provide a list of the names of each Class
Member who submitted a timely exclusion to Class Counsel after the deadline passes. A
copy of this list will be filed with the Court, along with the Parties’ Motion for Final
Approval of Class Action Settlement.
12.
In the written request for exclusion, the Class Member must set forth his or her full
name, address, telephone number and email address (if available), along with a statement
that he or she wishes to be excluded.
13.
Any Class Member who submits a valid and timely request for exclusion shall not
be bound by the terms of this Agreement.
14.
Any Class Member who intends to object to the fairness of this settlement must
file a written objection with the Court within 75 days from the Court’s entry of the Order
of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Further, any such Class Member
must, within the same time period, provide a copy of the written objection to Class
Counsel and Counsel for Defendants via U.S. Mail.
15.
In the written objection, the Class Member must state: his or her full name,
address, telephone number, and email address (if available); the reasons for his or her
9
objection; and, whether he or she intends to appear at the fairness hearing on his or her
own behalf or through counsel. Further, the Class Member must attach to his or her
objection any documents supporting the objection.
16.
Any Class Member who does not file a valid and timely objection to the settlement
shall be barred from seeking review of the settlement by appeal or otherwise.
17.
When responding to any inquiry from a Class Member, Plaintiff and Class
Counsel will confirm that they believe the settlement is fair and reasonable.
18.
Subject to approval by the Court, a fairness hearing will be conducted regarding
the settlement within 120 days from the Court’s entry of the Order of Preliminary
Approval of Class Action Settlement. Under Rule 23(c)(2)(B)(iv) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, the Class Members shall be notified that they may enter an appearance
through an attorney at their own expense if the member so desires.
19.
THE EFFECTIVE DATE – As defined in ¶ 1(B), the “Effective Date” shall be the
first date after Final Judgment Day and after Defendants complete the performance
requirements under ¶ 22 of this Agreement.
20.
RELEASES – As of the Effective Date, Plaintiff and the Class Members fully,
finally, and forever settle, release, and discharge the Released Parties from the Released
Claims, and are forever barred from asserting any of the Released Claims in any court or
forum whatsoever against any of the Released Parties.
21.
The provisions of any state, federal, municipal, local, or territorial law or statute
providing in substance that releases shall not extend to claims, demands, injuries, or
10
damages that are unknown or unsuspected to exist at the time a settlement agreement is
executed and approved by a court are hereby expressly, knowingly, and voluntarily
waived by Plaintiff and the Class Members.
22.
SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION – In consideration for the foregoing releases,
the Parties agree to the following:
A.
Settlement Fund – Van Ru shall establish a $2,300,000 Settlement Fund
(the “Settlement Fund”).
B.
Deductions - The following shall be deducted from the Settlement Fund
before any other distributions are made:
a.
The costs and expenses for the administration of the settlement and
class notice, including expenses necessary to identify Class Members; and
b.
Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs, subject to approval from this
Court and not to exceed 30% of the fund;
c.
The Incentive Payment to Nivea Ritchie: Plaintiff, Nivea Ritchie,
shall receive the sum of $12,000 as acknowledgment of her role in prosecuting this case
on behalf of the Class Members.
C.
Settlement Payment to Class Members - The Class Administrator shall send
via U.S. mail, address correction requested, the class notice to each Class Member at his
or her last known valid address. Each Class Member who submits a valid and timely
claim form with a postmark date no later than 75 days after the Court’s entry of the Order
11
of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement shall be entitled to participate in the
settlement as follows:
The remainder of the Settlement Fund after the above distributions are made will
be distributed on a pro-rata basis among those Class Members who return a valid and
timely claim form. Each Class Member who submits a valid and timely claim form shall
receive a pro-rata share of the remainder of the settlement fund after the deductions
described in ¶ 22(B). Each Class Member will be sent a claim form along with the
Notice described in ¶ 9. Each Class Member must return a claim form to receive a cash
payment.
Class Members must return their completed claim form to the Class
Administrator with a postmark date no later than 75 days after the Court’s entry of the
Order of Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement.
Within 30 days after Final Order Day, Defendants and the Class Administrator
shall send via U.S. mail a settlement check to each Class Member who submits a valid
and timely claim form. Defendants’ obligations pursuant this paragraph will be
considered fulfilled upon the mailing of the settlement checks, regardless of whether any
settlement check is received, returned, or cashed, except that the Class Administrator will
be obligated to take reasonable steps to forward all settlement checks returned with a
forwarding address to such forwarding addresses. Each settlement check will be will be
void sixty (60) days after mailing.
D.
Limited Reversion - To the extent that any funds remain in the Settlement
Fund after the void date (from uncashed checks or otherwise), these funds will be paid to
12
Van Ru to offset the costs of settlement administration, up to the costs of administration.
If checks that remain uncashed or are not paid after 60 days of the first pro rata
distribution yield an amount that, after administration costs for the making of a second
pro rata distribution, would allow a second pro rata distribution to the qualifying
claimants equal to or greater than $1.00 per qualifying claimant, a second pro rata
distribution will be made. If a second pro rata distribution is not made, the uncashed
amount will be paid to a non-profit(s) entity to be determined as a cy pres recipient. If a
second pro rata distribution is made, the amount of any checks that remain uncashed after
60 days of the second pro rata distribution will be distributed to the identified nonprofit(s).
23.
COVENANT NOT TO SUE – Plaintiff agrees and covenants, and each Class
Member will be deemed to have agreed and covenanted, not to sue any Released Party
with respect to any of the Released Claims, or otherwise to assist others in doing so, and
agree to be forever barred from doing so, in any court of law or equity, or any other
forum.
24.
TERMINATION – After completing a good faith negotiation, Class Counsel and
Defendants shall each have the right to terminate this Agreement by providing written
notice to the other within 7 days following:
A.
The Court’s refusal to enter an Order of Preliminary Approval of Class
Action Settlement in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A;
13
B.
The Court’s refusal to approve the settlement following notice to the Class
Members and the fairness hearing; or
C.
The Court’s refusal to enter a Final Order and Judgment in substantially the
form attached as Exhibit B.
25.
If either Class Counsel or Defendants terminates this Agreement as provided
herein, the Agreement shall be of no force and effect and the Parties’ rights and defenses
shall be restored, without prejudice, to their respective positions as if this Agreement had
never been executed.
26.
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES – In advance of the Final
Settlement Hearing, Class Counsel shall file an application for attorneys’ fees, costs, and
expenses in an amount not to exceed 30% of the Settlement Fund, subject to approval by
the Court. Defendants will not object to the fee, cost, and expense application, provided
the application seeks no more than 30% of the Settlement Fund. Any amount awarded to
Class Counsel for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses will be deducted from the
Settlement Fund prior to the distribution to the Class Members as described in ¶ 22(B).
27.
Van Ru shall forward to Class Counsel the check for the attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses awarded by the Court no later than 15 days after the Court’s order related to
such fees, costs, and expenses becomes final (non-appealable). Upon payment of
attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses to Class Counsel, the Released Parties shall have no
further obligation with respect to Class Counsel’s fees, costs, and expenses, or the fees,
costs, or expenses of any other attorney on behalf of Plaintiff or any Class Member.
14
28.
In the event that at any time prior to the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel or the
Class Administrator advise Defendants that more than 20% of Class Members elected to
opt out of participating in this Agreement, then Van Ru or Plaintiff shall have the option
to unilaterally terminate this settlement before the Fairness Hearing.
29.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS – Any exhibits to this Agreement are an
integral part of the settlement and are expressly incorporated herein as part of this
Agreement.
30.
This Agreement is for settlement purposes only. The Parties acknowledge that
this Agreement is not an admission of wrongdoing, negligence, or liability by Van Ru,
any Defendant or any Released Party.
This Agreement shall not be offered or be
admissible against Van Ru, any Defendant or any Released Party or cited or referred to,
in any action or proceeding, except in an action or proceeding brought to enforce its
terms.
31.
No representations, warranties, or inducements have been made to any of the
Parties, other than those representations, warranties, and covenants contained in this
Agreement.
32.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes
any and all other agreements between the Parties, including any and all other mediation
and settlement agreements. The terms of this Agreement are contractual.
33.
This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with Arizona law.
15
34.
Any dispute, challenge, or question relating to this Agreement shall be heard only
by this Court.
35.
The Parties shall request that the Court retain continuing and exclusive jurisdiction
over the Parties to this Agreement, including the Plaintiff and all Class Members, and
over the administration and enforcement of this Agreement.
36.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and
their representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns.
37.
In the event that any material provisions of this Agreement are held invalid or
unenforceable for any reason, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect other
provisions of this Agreement if Defendants and Class Counsel mutually elect to proceed
as if the invalid or unenforceable provision had never been included in the Agreement.
38.
This Agreement shall be deemed to have been drafted jointly by the Parties and, in
construing and interpreting this Agreement, no provision of this Agreement shall be
construed or interpreted against any party because such provision, or this Agreement as a
whole, was purportedly prepared or requested by such party.
39.
This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and the separate signature pages
executed by the Parties and their counsel may be combined to create a document binding
on all of the Parties and together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
40.
Thirty (30) days after Class Members’ checks become void, after the latter of
either the first or second pro-rata distribution described in Paragraph 22(B), Defendants
shall file a Notice of Compliance that they have complied with the terms of the
16
Agreement, all Class Members have been issued checks, and any undistributed funds or
uncashed checks have been sent to the agreed upon recipients. Fourteen days (14) after
the Notice of Compliance has been filed, Plaintiff shall file a motion for dismissal with
prejudice.
42.
Notices/Communications.
All
requests,
demands,
claims
and
other
communications hereunder shall: (a) be in writing; (b) be delivered by U.S. Mail; (c) be
deemed to have been duly given on the date received; and (d) be addressed to the
intended recipients as set forth below:
If to Plaintiff or the Class:
Michael Greenwald
Greenwald Davidson PLLC
5550 Glades Road, Suite 500
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
and
If to Van Ru:
James K. Schultz
Sessions, Fishman, Nathan & Israel, LLC
55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1120
Chicago, IL 60603
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties and their duly authorized attorneys have
caused this Agreement to be executed this 21st day of February, 2014.
SIGNATURES
17
________________________________
Nivea Ritchie
________________________________
Michael L. Greenwald
James L. Davidson
GREENWALD DAVIDSON PLLC
5550 Glades Road, Suite 500
Boca Raton, FL 33431
561-826-5477 tel
561-961-5684 fax
mgreenwald@mgjdlaw.com
jdavidson@mgjdlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Proposed Class Counsel
________________________________
Representative of Van Ru Credit Corp.
________________________________
James K. Schultz
Daniel W. Pisani
SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN, & ISRAEL, L.L.C.
55 W. Monroe St., Suite 1120
Chicago, IL 60603-5130
312-578-0990 tel
312 578 9991 fax
jschultz@sessions-law.biz
dpisani@sessions-law.biz
Attorneys for Defendants
18
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?