Pratt v. Office of Civil Rights et al

Filing 57

ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 42 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Gateway's motion for attorney's fees 43 in the amount of $1,054.00 is granted; Gateway is awarded $1,054.00 against Plaint iff. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that by January 13, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a memorandum showing cause why Defendant Colorado Department of Education should not be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (the Office of Civil Rights motion to dismiss remains pending). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/17/2013. (ALS)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Office of Civil Rights, Colorado Dept. of) Education, and Gateway Comm. College,) ) ) Defendants. ) ) Eddie Pratt, 9 10 11 12 13 14 CV 12-1821-PHX-JAT ORDER 15 On June 13, 2013, the Court issued the following order (quoted in part): 16 A. 17 ... 18 Gateway has also argued that the Complaint fails to state a claim. The Complaint (quoted in its entirety) alleges as follows: Motion to Dismiss 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I the plaintiff Eddie L. Pratt ask for a plea for relief and justice; resulting from a perceived loss of integrity, humiliated [sic], stature, dignity, harassment, abridged human rights, and slavery. That is why we need Titles’ V, VI, VII of the Civil Rights Act, HR, 7152 to prevent [sic] where Federal Funds are involved. Title VI, and the Title VII is sound; it is [sic] constitutional right. Now, what will it accomplish? It will guarantee that the money collected by colorblind tax collectors will be distributed by Federal and State administrator [sic] who are equally colorblind, eliminate [sic] discrimination. I file [sic] a complaint with both [sic] Office of Civil Rights - Attorney Thomas Rock and EEOC Rayford Irvin; “hostile environment” wrongful termination, and discrimination. They did not follow policy and procedure. [citation omitted]. The agencies didn’t investigate my case; which violated my civil rights [citation omitted]; unlawful basis; none [sic] white [sic] get less hours, less pay, while whites get more hours and more 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 pay. In fact, they dismiss [sic] my case and never gave me an appeal, and also denied a waiver. [citation omitted]. Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution declares that no state may not [sic] “deny” to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protect [sic] of the laws. [citation omitted]. Doc. 1. Rule 8(a)(2) requires a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” so that the defendant has “fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)(quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). Here, Defendant Gateway is never mentioned in the Complaint. Accordingly, the Complaint fails to state a claim against this Defendant under Twombly and the motion to dismiss will be granted. To the extent Plaintiff responded to this motion by a motion (Doc. 13), Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. B. Motion for Sanctions Defendant Gateway has also moved for sanctions under Rule 11(b) against Plaintiff for her various filings, including her continuous efforts to seeks default against Defendant Gateway while its motion to dismiss is pending. Doc. 29. Defendant Gateway argues that these motions are for the purposes of harassment and to increase the costs of the litigation. The Court agrees. Therefore, Defendant Gateway may file a motion for attorneys fees for the time expended in responding to Plaintiff’s five pending motions relating [to] default (Docs. 21, 22, 23, 25, and 31). To the extent Plaintiff has opposed the request for sanctions by a motion (Doc. 34), Plaintiff’s motion is denied. Further, all the pending motions for default will be denied. Doc. 41 at 1-3. Now, Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of this Order. The Court finds no basis for reconsideration; accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion will be denied. 20 Next, consistent with the Court’s Order, Defendant Gateway has moved for attorney’s 21 fees. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule Civil 7.2(i), the Court 22 summarily grants the motion. 23 Two defendants remain in this case: (1) the Colorado Department of Education and 24 (2) the Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education. The latter has moved to 25 dismiss and that motion remains pending. It would appear that this Court lacks personal 26 jurisdiction over the Colorado Department of Civil Rights. Plaintiff will be required to show 27 cause why the Colorado Department of Civil Rights should not be dismissed. 28 -2- 1 Based on the foregoing, 2 IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 42) is denied. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Gateway’s motion for attorney’s fees 4 (Doc. 43) in the amount of $1,054.00 is granted; Gateway is awarded $1,054.00 against 5 Plaintiff. 6 IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that by January 13, 2014, Plaintiff shall file a 7 memorandum showing cause why Defendant Colorado Department of Education should not 8 be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (the Office of Civil Rights motion to dismiss 9 remains pending). 10 DATED this 17th day of December, 2013. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?