Furtado v. Maricopa, County of et al
Filing
8
ORDER granting 2 Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot 6 Application/Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff ha s 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/2/12.(DMT)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Daniel Furtado, Jr.,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
Maricopa County, et al.,
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 12-2019-PHX-RCB (LOA)
ORDER
14
15
Plaintiff Daniel Furtado, Jr., who is confined in the Maricopa County Fourth Avenue
16
Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application
17
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.
18
On October 3, 2012, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) and a second
19
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court will dismiss the First Amended
20
Complaint with leave to amend.
21
I.
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
22
23
U.S.C. § 1915(a), and will deny as moot Plaintiff’s second Application. Plaintiff must pay
24
the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The Court will not assess an
25
initial partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The statutory fee will be collected monthly
26
in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount in the account
27
exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the
28
JDDL-K
The Court will grant Plaintiff’s first Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, 28
appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory
1
formula.
2
II.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
3
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against
4
a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
5
§ 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised
6
claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may
7
be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.
8
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
9
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
10
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not
11
demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-
12
unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
13
“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory
14
statements, do not suffice.” Id.
15
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
16
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
17
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content
18
that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the
19
misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for
20
relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial
21
experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual
22
allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there
23
are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951.
24
25
must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th
26
Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards
27
than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89,
28
JDDL-K
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts
94 (2007) (per curiam)).
-2-
1
If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts,
2
a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the
3
action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court
4
should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would
5
undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225,
6
231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was
7
required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s First
8
Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the First Amended Complaint
9
may possibly be saved by amendment, will dismiss the First Amended Complaint with leave
10
to amend.
11
III.
First Amended Complaint
12
An amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963
13
F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542,
14
1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court treats the original Complaint as
15
nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Thus, the Court will consider only those claims
16
raised in the First Amended Complaint against only those Defendants named in the First
17
Amended Complaint.
18
Plaintiff names the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County
19
Correctional Health Services, Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, and Dr. Rao as Defendants
20
in the First Amended Complaint.
21
22
and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when Defendants Maricopa County
23
Sheriff’s Office and Correctional Health Services provided him with negligent medical care
24
after he fell and injured his knee. Plaintiff claims that he was given Tylenol for his knee, but
25
that he did not receive professional medical treatment in a timely manner. Plaintiff claims
26
he was seen, almost a month after he sustained the injury, by Medical Provider Freidman
27
who informed him that he had fluid on his knee and other damage and referred him to an
28
JDDL-K
Plaintiff makes four claims for relief. In Count One, Plaintiff alleges that his Eighth
orthopedist. Plaintiff states that he has not yet seen the orthopedist. Plaintiff is receiving
-3-
1
physical therapy. Plaintiff further states that in September 2012 he was told he would be
2
scheduled for an MRI, but that he has yet to receive an MRI.
3
In Count Two, Plaintiff claims that the “Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,
4
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, [and] Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office are
5
grossly negligent in failing to reasonabl[y] treat Plaintiff’s injury.” Plaintiff alleges that the
6
Board of Supervisors’ “policies in partnership with M.C.C.H.S. [] makes them negligent for
7
[his] inadequate medical treatment.”
8
In Count Three, Plaintiff claims that Defendants Board of Supervisors, Correctional
9
Health Services, and Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office were deliberately indifferent to his
10
medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff claims the Board of
11
Supervisors “is deliberately indifferent for the fact of the contract with Maricopa County
12
Correctional Health Services” and that Correctional Health Services “is deliberately
13
indifferent with its policies of non-life threatening injury as an emergency.” Finally, Plaintiff
14
claims that Defendant Rao was deliberately indifferent in not immediately treating Plaintiff’s
15
injury.
16
17
In Count Four, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Rao “committed medical malpractice
by denying [him his] Health Needs Request to be seen by the provider.”
18
19
20
Plaintiff seeks money damages
IV.
Failure to State a Claim
A.
Defendants Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office and Maricopa County
Correctional Health Services
21
22
The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is not a proper defendant. In Arizona, the
23
responsibility of operating jails and caring for prisoners is placed by law upon the sheriff.
24
See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-441(A)(5); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 31-101. A sheriff’s office is simply
25
an administrative creation of the county sheriff to allow him to carry out his statutory duties
26
and not a “person” amenable to suit pursuant to § 1983. Accordingly, the Maricopa County
27
Sheriff’s Office will be dismissed from this action.
28
JDDL-K
Further, municipalities and other local governing bodies are included among those
-4-
1
“persons” who may be sued under § 1983. Monell v. Department of Social Services of New
2
York, 436 U.S. 658, 690-91 (1978). Because Maricopa County Correctional Health Services
3
is not a municipal corporation, a local governing body or a private corporation, it is not a
4
“person” amenable to suit under § 1983. Maricopa County is responsible for providing
5
medical care to county jail inmates. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-291(A). Any actions against
6
a county policy must be brought against the county itself and not against an administrative
7
subdivision of the county; Maricopa County Correctional Health Services is therefore an
8
improper defendant.
9
B.
Defendant Maricopa County Board of Supervisors
10
A municipality may not be sued solely because an injury was inflicted by one of its
11
employees or agents. Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir. 2006).
12
Rather, the municipality is liable only when the execution of its policy or custom inflicts the
13
constitutional injury. Id.; Miranda v. City of Cornelius, 429 F.3d 858, 868 (9th Cir. 2005).
14
Accordingly, a § 1983 claim against a municipal defendant “cannot succeed as a matter of
15
law” unless the plaintiff: (1) contends that the municipal defendant maintains a policy or
16
custom pertinent to the plaintiff’s alleged injury; and (2) explains how such policy or custom
17
caused the plaintiff’s injury. Sadoski v. Mosley, 435 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2006)
18
(affirming dismissal of a municipal defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)).
19
Plaintiff has alleged generally that a policy of Defendant Maricopa County Board of
20
Supervisors resulted in his injuries, but he has not described the policy nor has he explained
21
how it caused his injuries. Plaintiff has therefore failed to state a claim against Defendant
22
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors.
23
24
Not every claim by a prisoner relating to inadequate medical treatment states a
25
violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment. To state a § 1983 medical claim, a
26
plaintiff must show that the defendants acted with “deliberate indifference to serious medical
27
needs.” Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429
28
JDDL-K
C.
Medical Claims
U.S. 97, 104 (1976)). A plaintiff must show (1) a “serious medical need” by demonstrating
-5-
1
that failure to treat the condition could result in further significant injury or the unnecessary
2
and wanton infliction of pain and (2) the defendant’s response was deliberately indifferent.
3
Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096 (quotations omitted).
4
“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard.” Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051,
5
1060 (9th Cir. 2004). To act with deliberate indifference, a prison official must both know
6
of and disregard an excessive risk to inmate health; “the official must both be aware of facts
7
from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and
8
he must also draw the inference.” Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). Deliberate
9
indifference in the medical context may be shown by a purposeful act or failure to respond
10
to a prisoner’s pain or possible medical need and harm caused by the indifference. Jett, 439
11
F.3d at 1096. Deliberate indifference may also be shown when a prison official intentionally
12
denies, delays, or interferes with medical treatment or by the way prison doctors respond to
13
the prisoner’s medical needs. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05; Jett, 439 F.3d at 1096.
14
Deliberate indifference is a higher standard than negligence or lack of ordinary due
15
care for the prisoner’s safety. Farmer, 511 U.S. at 835. “Neither negligence nor gross
16
negligence will constitute deliberate indifference.” Clement v. California Dep’t of
17
Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1105 (N.D. Cal. 2002); see also Broughton v. Cutter
18
Labs., 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir. 1980) (mere claims of “indifference,” “negligence,” or
19
“medical malpractice” do not support a claim under § 1983). “A difference of opinion does
20
not amount to deliberate indifference to [a plaintiff’s] serious medical needs.” Sanchez v.
21
Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). A mere delay in medical care, without more, is
22
insufficient to state a claim against prison officials for deliberate indifference. See Shapley
23
v. Nevada Bd. of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985). The indifference
24
must be substantial. The action must rise to a level of “unnecessary and wanton infliction
25
of pain.” Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105.
26
27
indifference to his serious medical needs. Plaintiff’s conclusory allegations of deliberate
28
JDDL-K
Plaintiff has not alleged facts demonstrating that Defendants acted with deliberate
indifference are not sufficient; Plaintiff must allege facts showing that a defendant was aware
-6-
1
of his serious medical needs but failed to act appropriately. Further, claims of medical
2
malpractice or negligence are not sufficient to state an Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment
3
claim.
4
V.
Leave to Amend
5
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint will be dismissed for
6
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may
7
submit a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of
8
Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a second amended complaint.
9
If Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the second amended
10
complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.
11
If Plaintiff files a second amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain
12
statements telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2)
13
the name of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or
14
failed to do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of
15
Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of that
16
Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).
17
Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If Plaintiff
18
fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific injury
19
suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for failure to
20
state a claim. Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of Defendants have
21
violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be dismissed.
22
Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “Second
23
Amended Complaint.” The second amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its
24
entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original
25
Complaint or First Amended Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim
26
per count.
27
28
JDDL-K
A second amended complaint supersedes the original Complaint and First Amended
Complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v.
-7-
1
Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will
2
treat the original Complaint and First Amended Complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d
3
at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint or First Amended
4
Complaint is waived if it is not raised in a second amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814
5
F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).
6
VI.
Warnings
7
A.
Release
8
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release.
9
Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay
10
the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result
11
in dismissal of this action.
12
B.
Address Changes
13
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule
14
83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other
15
relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this
16
action.
17
C.
Copies
18
Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
19
LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice
20
to Plaintiff.
21
22
Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim,
23
if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in
24
this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C.
25
§ 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal
26
a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more
27
prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal
28
JDDL-K
D.
Possible “Strike”
in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,
-8-
1
malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is
2
under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3
E.
4
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these
5
warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at
6
1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the
7
Court).
8
IT IS ORDERED:
9
10
11
12
(1)
Possible Dismissal
Plaintiff’s September 24, 2012 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
(Doc. 2) is granted.
(2)
As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency,
Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is not assessed an initial partial filing fee.
13
(3)
Plaintiff’s October 3, 2012 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 6)
14
is denied as moot.
15
(4)
The First Amended Complaint (Doc. 5) is dismissed for failure to state a claim.
16
Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a second amended complaint in
17
compliance with this Order.
18
(5)
If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk
19
of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with
20
prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
21
22
23
(6)
The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil
rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 2nd day of November, 2012.
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
-9-
Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint
in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated
persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These
complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form
should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state
conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas
corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence,
you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that
entered the judgment.
2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by
incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or
neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All
questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If
needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard
letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and
number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional
or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to
cite law.
3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of
a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.
4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately
pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the
“Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in
Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions.
5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and
of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court
if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be
identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten.
6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined
when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined
in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were
confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott
Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file
in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing
fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:
Revised 3/9/07
1
Phoenix & Prescott Divisions:
OR
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130
401 West Washington Street, SPC 10
Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119
Tucson Division:
U.S. District Court Clerk
U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500
405 West Congress Street
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010
7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing
of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your
mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.
8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you
submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis).
Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma
pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date
a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a
certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed
this
(month, day, year) to:
Name:
Address:
Attorney for Defendant(s)
(Signature)
9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint,
you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave
(permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to
amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an
amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv
15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are
considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time.
10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint.
Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use
to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial.
11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff
of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written
pleading or motion.
2
12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form.
HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing
address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you
name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line,
write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the
names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED”
in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do
so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are
seeking only injunctive relief.
Part A. JURISDICTION:
1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics
Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of
that authority.
2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights
occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the
spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the
necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,”
“2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:
You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while
you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces
provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary
information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.
Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:
You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to
allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three
counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate
page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page
5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.
3
1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the
violation of only one civil right per count.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your
claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,”
you must identify the specific issue involved.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must
state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each
individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you
must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which
the act(s) occurred, if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies
before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you
should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or
administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures
were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided.
Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:
Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.
SIGNATURE:
You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign
the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not
bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself.
FINAL NOTE
You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your
complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper
space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional
pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach
additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and
number the pages.
4
Name and Prisoner/Booking Number
Place of Confinement
Mailing Address
City, State, Zip Code
(Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
(Full Name of Plaintiff)
Plaintiff,
vs.
(1)
(Full Name of Defendant)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Defendant(s).
G
Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them.
)
, )
)
)
) CASE NO.
)
(To be supplied by the Clerk)
, )
)
, )
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT
)
, )
BY A PRISONER
)
, )
G Original Complaint
G First Amended Complaint
)
)
G Second Amended Complaint
A. JURISDICTION
1.
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
G Other:
.
Institution/city where violation occurred:
.
Revised 3/9/07
1
550/555
B. DEFENDANTS
1.
Name of first Defendant:
at
. The first Defendant is employed as:
.
(Position and Title)
2.
(Institution)
Name of second Defendant:
at
. The second Defendant is employed as:
.
(Position and Title)
3.
(Institution)
Name of third Defendant:
at
. The third Defendant is employed as:
.
(Position and Title)
4.
(Institution)
Name of fourth Defendant:
at
. The fourth Defendant is employed as:
.
(Position and Title)
(Institution)
If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page.
C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
1.
Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner?
2.
If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed?
G Yes
G No
. Describe the previous lawsuits:
a. First prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
b. Second prior lawsuit:
v.
1. Parties:
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
c. Third prior lawsuit:
1. Parties:
v.
2. Court and case number:
3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?)
.
.
If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page.
2
D. CAUSE OF ACTION
1.
COUNT I
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies:
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
3
1.
COUNT II
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
at your institution?
G Yes G No
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
4
1.
COUNT III
State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated:
.
2.
Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts.
G Basic necessities
G Mail
G Access to the court
G Medical care
G Disciplinary proceedings
G Property
G Exercise of religion
G Retaliation
G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other:
.
3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what
each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without
citing legal authority or arguments.
.
4.
Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s).
.
5.
Administrative Remedies.
a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available
G Yes G No
at your institution?
b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III?
G Yes G No
c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level?
G Yes G No
d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why
you did not.
.
If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page.
5
E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are seeking:
.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on
DATE
SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF
(Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or
other person who helped prepare this complaint)
(Signature of attorney, if any)
(Attorney’s address & telephone number)
ADDITIONAL PAGES
All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may
attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent
applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued
and number all pages.
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?