Shabie v. Ryan et al
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 54 ), is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Paula Carpenter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendant Paula Carpenter is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/31/2015. (KMG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate
Judge (“R&R”), (Doc. 54), recommending that this case be dismissed as to Defendant
Paula Carpenter for Plaintiff’s failure to serve that defendant.
Neither party filed objections to the R&R.1 Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts
the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are
not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th
Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the
Subsequent to issuing the R&R, the Magistrate Judge issued an order to show
cause as to why this case should not be dismissed entirely for Plaintiff’s failure to
prosecute. (Doc. 56). Defendant responded to the order to the show cause. Out of an
abundance of caution, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s response to the order to show cause
to ensure it did not contain objections to the R&R. The response makes no mention of the
R&R, its reasoning, or Plaintiff’s failure to serve Defendant Carpenter.
magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not
otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219,
1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
The Court emphasizes that the R&R only recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s
claims against Defendant Carpenter, and therefore does not affect Plaintiff’s claims
against the remaining Defendants.
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,
(Doc. 54), is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Paula
Carpenter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Defendant Paula Carpenter is
Dated this 31st day of March, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?