Neff v. Astrue
ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 35 ) as to 9CCA #14-15839, re: 30 Notice of Appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 5/19/2014.(KMG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of the)
Social Security Administration,
Lela K. Neff,
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
on appeal (Doc. 35). Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a
party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal to file a motion in district court,
attaching an affidavit that: “(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix
of Forms the party’s inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs; (B) claims an
entitlement to redress; and (C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.”
Plaintiff has complied with these requirements. The Court finds that Plaintiff has made a
sufficient showing that she cannot pay the fees and costs of her appeal. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
on appeal (Doc. 35).
DATED this 19th day of May, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?