Munoz v. USA
Filing
24
ORDER, denying Petitioner's 23 Motion for copies. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/15/14.(REW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Juan Victor Munoz,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
United States,
13
Respondent.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-12-2240-PHX-FJM
CR-09-0784-PHX-FJM
ORDER
15
16
17
The court has before it petitioner’s motion for copies of documents filed on the docket
18
in this closed case (doc. 23). Petitioner says that he has lost his original copies and asks the
19
court for duplicate copies at no charge given his pro se status.
20
An inmate has no right to free copies. 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “does not give a litigant a
21
right to have documents copied and returned to him at government expense.” In re Richard,
22
914 F.2d 1526, 1527 (6th Cir. 1990).
23
constitutional right to unlimited free photocopying. Johnson v. Moore, 926 F.2d 921, 923
24
(9th Cir. 1991) superceded on other grounds, 948 F.2d 517 (9th Cir. 1991).
Further, the Ninth Circuit has rejected any
25
The Clerk of Court charges 50 cents per page for reproducing any record or paper.
26
See Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees ¶ 4, foll. 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Petitioner may obtain
27
copies of documents filed in this case by submitting a written request to the Clerk of Court
28
accompanied by payment of the 50 cents per page copy fee.
1
IT IS ORDERED DENYING petitioner’s motion for copies (doc. 23).
2
DATED this 15th day of August, 2014.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?