Young v. Liberty Mutual Group Incorporated et al

Filing 35

ORDER The parties have fully briefed the issues regarding Defendant Mike Dumas's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's complaint against him (Doc. 5 ). Having considered the parties briefs the Court finds oral argument would not aid the Court� 39;s decisional process. Accordingly, the Court vacates the Oral Argument on Defendant Mike Dumas's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5), scheduled for Monday, March 11, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. MST. See Partridge v. Reich, 141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998); Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pac. Dev. Malibu Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/6/2013. (KMG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

No. CV-12-2302-PHX-JAT

Dawn Young,
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

ORDER

Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.; et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

The parties have fully briefed the issues regarding Defendant Mike Dumas’s

16

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint against him (Doc. 5). Having considered the

17

parties’ briefs the Court finds oral argument would not aid the Court’s decisional process.

18

Accordingly, the Court vacates the Oral Argument on Defendant Mike Dumas’s Motion

19

to Dismiss (Doc. 5), scheduled for Monday, March 11, 2013, at 4:00 p.m. MST. See

20

Partridge v. Reich, 141 F.3d 920, 926 (9th Cir. 1998); Lake at Las Vegas Investors

21

Group, Inc. v. Pac. Dev. Malibu Corp., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991).

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated this 6th day of March, 2013.