Elsas v. Astrue

Filing 22

ORDER, affirming the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 3/4/14. (REW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of) ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Victoria Elsas, No. CV-12-02390-PHX-FJM ORDER 16 17 This is an action for judicial review of a denial of disability insurance benefits and 18 supplemental security income under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 19 1383(c). The court has before it plaintiff’s opening brief (doc. 13), defendant’s response 20 (doc. 20), and plaintiff’s reply (doc. 21). 21 The plaintiff argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) failed to properly weigh 22 medical source opinion evidence, improperly discounted plaintiff’s subjective complaints, 23 and erred in applying the Medical-Vocational Guidelines. 24 We have reviewed the record and conclude that substantial evidence supports the 25 ALJ’s findings that plaintiff retains the residual functional capacity to perform a limited 26 range of sedentary work. We also conclude that the ALJ gave sufficiently specific and 27 legitimate reasons for discounting the opinions of plaintiff’s treating physicians and 28 discounting the severity of plaintiff’s subjective complaints, based on contradicting medical 1 opinions, objective medical evidence, and plaintiff’s daily activities. Finally, the ALJ did 2 not err in using the Medical Vocational Guidelines as a framework for considering the effect 3 of plaintiff’s nonexertional limitations. 4 nonexertional limitations would have little or no effect on the occupational base of unskilled 5 sedentary work is substantially supported by the record. The ALJ’s determination that plaintiff’s 6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS ORDERED AFFIRMING the decision of the Commissioner denying benefits. 8 DATED this 4th day of March, 2014. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?