Smith v. Chandler, City of et al
Filing
206
ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED GRANTING in part Defendants' Motion for Payment of Transcripts (Doc. 203 ). Plaintiff shall pay for the transcripts identified above and any additional transcripts cited in Defendant's answering brief in the court of appeals [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/18/17. (MAW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Brandon Smith,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
City of Chandler; Keith Smith,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 12-02391-PHX-FJM
ORDER
15
The court has before it Defendants’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Pay for Transcripts
16
17
(Doc. 203), Plaintiff’s response (Doc. 204), and Defendants’ reply (Doc. 205).
18
This motion arises under Rule 10-3.1(f), Rules of the Ninth Circuit. The parties are
19
unable to agree over those portions of the transcript necessary for Plaintiff’s appeal, and who
20
should bear the cost.
21
Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (Doc. 197) appealed from, among other things, “the jury
22
verdict.” Yet Plaintiff only ordered the direct examination of the Plaintiff himself (Doc.
23
201). Belatedly, Plaintiff narrowed the scope of his appeal to the granting of the motion for
24
judgment as a matter of law on the state negligence claim and the granting of fees and costs
25
(Doc. 204). He now contends that only the direct examination of Plaintiff, and witnesses
26
Dean and Marcie Smith are necessary on the negligence claim. Defendants contend that,
27
except for transcripts previously ordered, all trial transcripts are necessary.
28
///
1
Our granting of the motion for judgment as a matter of law on the state negligence claim
2
was based on the undisputed Arizona law that where there is no evidence that Defendants’
3
conduct caused the underlying mental condition that caused the attempted suicide, the
4
attempted suicide breaks the chain of proximate causation. There was simply no evidence
5
in this case to support a finding that Defendants caused Plaintiff’s pre-existing, underlying
6
mental condition. The whole reason that Defendants came to the house was because Plaintiff
7
was delusional, suicidal and frightening.
8
This is a state law issue. The issue is settled in Arizona. Neither we nor the circuit are
9
free to tinker with Arizona law. And, because it is settled, certification was neither sought
10
nor appropriate. I therefore regard the appeal as misguided. Changes in Arizona law should
11
begin and end in the Arizona courts.
12
Plaintiff should order and pay for any transcript that relates in any way to causation and
13
Plaintiff’s mental state before, during and after the arrival of the police, whether Plaintiff
14
intends to rely on it or not. I cannot tell, at this point, what that is. It would include, at a
15
minimum, the full transcript of Plaintiff’s own examination, Dean and Marcie Smith, Dr.
16
Beckson, the officers on the scene, and Plaintiff’s mother, Susan Noble. After Plaintiff’s
17
opening brief is filed, Defendants will know what other portions of the transcript they will
18
need in addition to those ordered by Plaintiff. If Defendants cite and rely on any portion of
19
the transcripts not paid for by Plaintiff, Plaintiff shall pay for those transcripts as well.
20
It is therefore ORDERED GRANTING in part Defendants’ Motion for Payment of
21
Transcripts (Doc. 203).
22
additional transcripts cited in Defendant’s answering brief in the court of appeals.
23
Plaintiff shall pay for the transcripts identified above and any
DATED this 18th day of December, 2017.
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?