J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Pineda et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting 14 Motion for Default Judgment. The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants in the total amount of $5,000. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/23/13. (LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

J & J Sports Productions Inc.,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
Erario Pineda; ET LLC,
13
Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-12-02406-PHX-FJM
ORDER

15
16
The court has before it plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment (doc. 14).
17
Plaintiff was granted the exclusive commercial right to distribute the “Tactical Warfare”:
18
Manny Pacquiao v. Antonio Margarito, WBC Light Middleweight Championship Fight
19
Program telecast on Saturday, November 13, 2010 via closed-circuit television (“the
20
Program”). Plaintiff alleges that defendants willfully and unlawfully intercepted and
21
exhibited the Program at La Cabana, a drink establishment located in Glendale, Arizona, in
22

violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605 (governing unlawful interception of satellite signals).1 Although

23
served, defendants have failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. The clerk
24
entered default against defendants on February 20, 2013 (doc. 12). Plaintiff now seeks
25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiff’s complaint also seeks relief under 47 U.S.C. § 553, which governs the
unauthorized interception of cable communications. In its motion for default judgment,
however, plaintiff requests recovery under 47 U.S.C. § 605 only.

1

default judgment against defendants in the amount of $114,200.00, plus attorney’s fees and

2

costs.

3

Section 605(a) of the Communications Act prohibits the unauthorized receipt and use

4

of radio communications, including satellite television signals, for one’s own benefit or the

5

benefit of another. DirecTV, Inc. v. Webb, 545 F.3d 837, 844 (9th Cir. 2008). Under § 605,

6

a plaintiff can recover either actual or statutory damages. 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C).

7

Statutory damages are available “in a sum of not less than $1,000 or more than $10,000" for

8

each violation “as the court considers just.” 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II). To determine

9

an appropriate reward, the court balances the need to deter future illegal conduct against the

10

harm that will result to the defendant’s business if significant damages are assessed.

11

Kingvision Pay-Per-View Ltd. v. Lake Alice Bar, 168 F.3d 347, 350 (9th Cir. 1999).

12

If a court “finds that the violation was committed willfully and for purposes of direct

13

or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain,” it may exercise discretion and

14

increase the damages award by up to $100,000 per violation. 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii).

15

“Courts use a variety of factors in determining whether a defendant’s conduct is subject to

16

enhanced damages for willfulness under § 605, including prior infringements, substantial

17

unlawful monetary gains, significant actual damages to the plaintiff, the defendant’s

18

advertising of the broadcast, and the defendant’s charging a cover charge or premium for

19

food and drinks during the broadcast.” Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Guzman, 2008 WL

20

1924988, at *3 (D. Ariz. April 30, 2008).

21

By defaulting, defendants admit that they intercepted and exhibited the Program to

22

their patrons without obtaining a license from plaintiff in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605, and

23

did so “willfully and for purposes of direct and/or indirect commercial advantage and/or

24

private financial gain.” Compl. ¶ 20 (doc. 1). We conclude that statutory damages under §

25

605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II) in the amount of $3,000 is appropriate. Plaintiff’s request for enhanced

26

damages of $100,000, however, is “manifestly excessive.” See Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.

27

v. Streshly, 655 F. Supp. 2d 1136, 1139 (S. D. Cal. 2009) (stating that the court will “not

28

indulge Plaintiff’s attempt to obtain the biggest judgment it can by filing cookie-cutter
-2-

1

pleadings”).

2

The Cabana is a commercial establishment with a maximum capacity of 200 people.

3

According to plaintiff’s investigator, there were approximately 200 patrons in the

4

establishment while the Program was displayed on one television. Patrons were not charged

5

a cover fee, and there is no evidence that defendants advertised the Program to draw

6

additional crowds, or charged either a cover fee or a premium for food or drinks. Affidavit

7

at 2. Moreover there are no allegations of prior infringement or of plaintiff’s having suffered

8

significant actual damages. Therefore, under the facts of this case, we conclude that an

9

enhanced damages award of $2,000 is reasonable. A total damages award of $5,000 will

10

both compensate plaintiff and act as a deterrent against future violations.

11

Plaintiff also seeks $4,200 in damages for conversion. However, it presents no

12

argument or evidence to support this request. We decline to award any additional damages

13

on the conversion claim.

14

Finally, plaintiff’s general request for attorney’s fees is denied. Plaintiff must file a

15

motion for attorney’s fees in accordance with LRCiv 54.2. Plaintiff’s counsel should charge

16

only for hours actually expended on this case, taking into account the boilerplate pleadings

17

and motion-related forms used by this counsel in hundreds of other similar actions.

18

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (doc. 14).

19

The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendants in the total amount

20

of $5,000.

21

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2013.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-