Ramirez-Garcia v. Ryan et al

Filing 23

ORDER that Plaintiff's April 23, 2015 Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 22 ) is denied. Plaintiff must not file additional documents in this closed case, except in furtherance of an appeal. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 6/24/15.(KGM)

1

KM

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Eduardo Ramirez-Garcia,

10
11
12

No. CV 12-2678-PHX-DLR (JFM)

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

13
14

Defendants.

15
16

On December 17, 2012, Plaintiff Eduardo Ramirez-Garcia, who is confined in the

17

Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In a June 21, 2013

19

Order, the Court granted the Application to Proceed and dismissed the Complaint

20

because Plaintiff had failed to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file an

21

amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order.

22

On August 6, 2013, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint. In a November

23

4, 2013 Order, the Court dismissed the First Amended Complaint because Plaintiff had

24

failed to state a claim. The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended

25

complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order.

26

On December 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint.

27

February 25, 2014 Order, the Court dismissed the Second Amended Complaint and this

28

action for failure to state a claim (Doc. 17). Judgment was entered on the same date

In a

1

(Doc. 18). On February 12, 2015, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Relief from Judgment

2

pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1) and (c),” which the Court denied in an April 7, 2015 Order.

3

On April 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration asking the Court to

4

reconsider its decision in the April 7, 2015 Order. Plaintiff’s Motion simply re-argues

5

Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment, and the Court finds no reason to reconsider

6

its decision in the April 7 Order.

7

Reconsideration.

The Court will deny Plaintiff’s Motion for

8

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s April 23, 2015 Motion for Reconsideration

9

(Doc. 22) is denied. Plaintiff must not file additional documents in this closed case,

10
11

except in furtherance of an appeal.
Dated this 24th day of June, 2015.

12
13
14
15
16

Douglas L. Rayes
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-