Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Eagle Mechanical Insulation LLC

Filing 16

ORDER AAND JUDGMENT AGAINST GARNISHEE (NON-EARNINGS) - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has judgment against Garnishee in the amount of $4,516.37. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garnishee has judgment against Defendant in the amount of  6;100.00 for reasonable compensation for answering the Writ, to be paid from the garnished funds pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1591(b). IT IS ORDERED: 1. Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan's R & R (Doc. 8) is accepted, and Plaintiff's orig inal Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non-Earnings (Doc. 6) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's second Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non- Earnings (Doc. 15) is granted. 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff against Garnishee in the amount of $4,516.37 and judgment for Garnishee against Defendant in the amount of $100.00. The Clerk shall then terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/28/13. (LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 8 9 TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ASBESTOS WORKERS MEDICAL FUND, 10 Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor, 11 12 13 14 No. MC12-0096-PHX-DGC ORDER AND JUDGMENT AGAINST GARNISHEE (NON-EARNINGS) v. EAGLE MECHANICAL INSULATION LLC, Defendant/Judgment Debtor. 15 16 WELLS FARGO BANK, 17 18 Garnishee. 19 20 Before the Court is the Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non-Earnings filed 21 by Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund 22 (“Plaintiff”) (Doc. 6), United States Magistrate Steven P. Logan’s Report and Recommendation 23 (“R & R”) (Doc. 8), and Plaintiff’s second Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non- 24 Earnings (Doc. 15). The R & R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s original Application 25 (Doc. 6) because the record, at the time, did not establish that Defendant/Judgment Debtor Eagle 26 Mechanical Insulation LLC (“Defendant”) had received “a copy of the summons and writ of 27 garnishment, a copy of the underlying judgment and the notice to judgment debtor and request 28 1 for hearing form,” as required by Arizona’s garnishment statute. See A.R.S. § 12-1574(D). 2 Judge Logan found that “the Writ of Garnishment and Summons (Doc. 3) d[id] not instruct 3 Garnishee to serve Defendant with those documents,” and “[i]n its Answer (Doc. 5), 4 Garnishee . . . does not assert that those documents were mailed to Defendant . . . [and] states 5 only that a copy of the Answer has been delivered to Plaintiff and Defendant (Doc. 5 at 2).” 6 Doc. 8 at 3. Plaintiff’s response to the R & R requested that the Court delay ruling on the 7 original Application until the Garnishee answers a newly issued Writ of Garnishment. Doc. 12. 8 The Court issued a second Writ of Garnishment to Garnishee that specifically instructed 9 Garnishee to serve the statutorily required papers on Defendant. Doc. 11. Garnishee’s Answer 10 certifies that “a copy of the summons and writ of garnishment, a copy of the underlying 11 judgment and the notice to judgment debtor and request for hearing form was delivered to the 12 judgment debtor on 12/7/12 [], via mail.” Doc. 14 at 2. The Answer also shows the following: 13 14 1. 2. Garnishee owes Judgment Debtor $4,616.37. Garnishee claims an answering fee of $100.00. 15 16 17 Plaintiff’s Second Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non-Earnings requests that the Court enter judgment on its behalf because the record now establishes that the 18 deficiencies found in Judge Logan’s R & R have been cured. Doc. 15. The record does so 19 demonstrate. 20 21 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff has judgment against Garnishee in the amount of $4,516.37. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Garnishee has judgment against Defendant in the 23 amount of $100.00 for reasonable compensation for answering the Writ, to be paid from the 24 garnished funds pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1591(b). 25 IT IS ORDERED: 26 1. Magistrate Judge Steven P. Logan’s R & R (Doc. 8) is accepted, and Plaintiff’s 27 original Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non-Earnings (Doc. 6) is 28 denied. -2- 1 2. (Doc. 15) is granted. 2 3 Plaintiff’s second Application for Judgment on Garnishment of Non- Earnings 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff against Garnishee in the 4 amount of $4,516.37 and judgment for Garnishee against Defendant in the amount 5 of $100.00. The Clerk shall then terminate this action. 6 Dated this 28th day of January, 2013. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?