Stallings v. Ryan et al
ORDER that Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date this Order is filed to file any response to Defendants' 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey on 3/27/2014. (See Order for details.)(LFIG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Brian K. Stallings,
) CIV 13-00067 PHX RCB MEA
Charles L. Ryan, Thomas A. Bell,)
Nurse Martin, Wexford Health
Defendants Ryan and Martin have filed a motion for
summary judgment (Doc. 53), with regard to Plaintiff’s claims
against these Defendants, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
NOTICE--WARNING TO PLAINTIFF
THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO YOU BY THE COURT1
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment seeks to have
your claims against these Defendants denied as a matter of law.
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose
a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must
be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact,
i.e., if there is no real dispute about any fact that would
affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary
judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is
Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc).
properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony),
you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says.
you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions,
provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the
Defendant’s declarations and documents and show that there is a
genuine issue of material fact for trial.
appropriate, may be entered against you with regard to your
If you do not submit
claims against these Defendants.
Rule 56.1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona also
requires, in addition, that you include as a part of your
opposition to a motion for summary judgment a separate statement
of facts in opposition to the motion for summary judgment.
Any party opposing a motion for summary
judgment must file a statement, separate from
that party’s memorandum of law, setting
forth: (1) for each paragraph of the moving
party’s separate statement of facts, a
correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating
whether the party disputes the statement of
fact set forth in that paragraph and a
reference to the specific admissible portion
of the record supporting the party’s position
if the fact is disputed; and (2) any
additional facts that establish a genuine
issue of material fact or otherwise preclude
judgment in favor of the moving party. Each
additional fact must be set forth in a
separately numbered paragraph and must refer
to a specific admissible portion of the
record where the fact finds support.
Rule 7.2, United States District Court for the District
of Arizona Local Rules of Civil Procedure, subparagraph (e)
(1) Unless otherwise permitted by the Court,
a motion including its supporting memorandum,
and the response including its supporting
memorandum, may not exceed seventeen (17)
pages, exclusive of attachments and any
required statement of facts.
(2) Unless otherwise permitted by the Court,
a reply including its supporting memorandum
may not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive
Subparagraph (i) provides:
If a motion does not conform in all
substantial respects with the requirements of
this Local Rule, or if the unrepresented
party or counsel does not serve and file the
required answering memoranda, or if the
unrepresented party or counsel fails to
appear at the time and place assigned for
oral argument, such non-compliance may be
deemed a consent to the denial or granting of
the motion and the Court may dispose of the
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have
thirty (30) days from the date this order is filed to file any
response to Defendants Martin and Ryan’s motion for summary
appropriate exhibits and a separate statement of facts.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file any
response is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed
ready for decision without oral argument on the day following
the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the
name on whose behalf it is filed.
DATED this 27th day of March, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?