Seldon v. Magedson et al

Filing 12

ORDER that the 6 Motion to Quash Service is denied as moot. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/29/2013.(LFIG)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Phillip Seldon, No. CV-13-0072 PHX DGC Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Edward Magedson a/k/a Ed Magedson; et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On January 1, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint with this Court. Doc. 1. On 16 February 4, 2013, Plaintiff served a complaint on Defendant Xcentric Ventures. Doc. 5. 17 Defendant thereupon filed a motion to quash service of process. Doc. 6. In its motion, 18 Defendant argued that the served complaint was different from the filed complaint. Id. 19 Specifically, the served complaint included a request for a jury trial, while the filed 20 complaint did not, and the paragraph numbering for the complaints was different. Doc. 9 21 at 1. Since then, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Doc. 11) and Defendant now 22 confirms that Plaintiff appropriately served the amended complaint. See Doc. 9 at 2. 23 Because Defendant has been appropriately served with the amended complaint, its 24 motion to quash service of the original complaint (Doc. 6) is denied as moot. 25 26 27 28 Dated this 29th day of March, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?