Brooks v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Drop his Claim; this case is dismissed without prejudice; the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 9/30/813.(REW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Donimic T. Brooks,
No. CV 13-220-PHX-RCB (BSB)
Corrections Corporation of America, et
On February 1, 2013, Plaintiff Donimic T. Brooks, who is confined in the
Corrections Corporation of America’s Saguaro Correctional Center in Eloy, Arizona,
filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a Declaration in
Support, a Motion for Summary Judgment, and a Declaration in Support of Request to
Proceed Without Paying Filing Fee (“First Application to Proceed”). On February 13,
2013, he filed a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“Second Application to
Proceed”). On February 26, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis by a Prisoner (“Third Application to Proceed”) and a Motion for Appointment
In an April 25, 2013 Order, the Court denied the three deficient Applications to
Proceed and gave Plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing fee or file a complete Application to
Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On May 17, 2013, Plaintiff filed another Application to
Proceed In Forma Pauperis. In an August 28, 2013 Order, the Court granted the May 17
Application to Proceed, dismissed the Complaint because Plaintiff had failed to state a
claim upon which relief could be granted, denied as moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, and denied his Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Court gave Plaintiff
30 days to file an amended complaint that cured the deficiencies identified in the Order.
On September 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Drop his Claim (Doc. 14),
seeking to “drop [his] claim/suit of the above case.” Under Rule 41(a) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may dismiss an action without an order of the court by
filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service of an answer or a motion for
summary judgment. The right to voluntarily dismiss an action under these circumstances
is absolute. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077
(9th Cir. 1999). The Court will therefore grant Plaintiff’s Motion to Drop his Claim.
IT IS ORDERED:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Drop his Claim (Doc. 14) is granted.
This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter
DATED this 30th day of September, 2013.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?