Game Truck Licensing LLC v. Hampton

Filing 24

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Discovery due by 8/8/2014. Dispositive motions due by 9/19/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/13/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 9/11/2013. (LMR)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Chris Hampton, dba Games Go2U,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
And Related Counterclaim.
)
_________________________________ )
Game Truck Licensing, LLC,

No. CV-13-281-PHX-SMM

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

16
17

On September 9, 2013, a Preliminary Pretrial Conference was held in open Court

18

pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Prior to the conference, the

19

parties filed a Rule 26(f) Case Management Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case

20

Management Plan, and the representations made by the parties at the Rule 16 Preliminary

21

Pretrial Conference, all parties were ordered to comply with the deadlines established in this

22

Order.

23
24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the current provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure shall apply to all proceedings concerning this case.

25

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Initial Disclosures as defined in Federal Rule

26

of Civil Procedure 26(a), if not already exchanged prior to the time of this Preliminary

27

Pretrial Conference, shall be made no later than five (5) days after date of entry of this

28

Order or, in the alternative, no later than Friday, September 13, 2013.

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of

2

Civil Procedure 26(a), the parties shall file with the Clerk of the Court a Notice of Initial

3

Disclosure, rather than copies of the actual disclosures.

4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any amendment to the Complaint shall be filed
no later than N/A . Any amendment to the Answer shall be filed no later than N/A .

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day to notify opposing counsel of names

7

of custodians of digital records with potential relevance to issues in dispute is Friday,

8

October 18, 2013.

9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day notify to opposing counsel of any

10

objections to named custodians and/or suggestions of additional custodians is Friday,

11

November 1, 2013.

12
13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day to certify completion of steps 2 and
3 of Approved E-Discovery Protocol is Friday, December 16, 2013.

14

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last day to provide digital records in native

15

file format responsive to any prior pending discovery requests is Friday, January 31, 2014.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall disclose the identity of any

17

person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 701,

18

702, 703, 704, and 705 no later than Friday February 28, 2014.1 The Defendant shall

19

disclose the identity of any person who may be used at trial to present evidence under Federal

20

Rules of Evidence 701, 702, 703, 704, or 705 no later than Friday, March 28, 2014.

21

Rebuttal experts, if any, shall be disclosed no later than Friday, May 2, 2014. No deposition

22

of any expert witnesses shall occur before the disclosures concerning expert witnesses

23

mandated by this Order are made. Depositions of all expert witnesses must be concluded by

24

Friday, August 8, 2014.

25
26

1

27

The parties are hereby given notice that this Order requires disclosure greater than that
required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).

28

-2-

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for filing Daubert challenges shall

2

be Friday, May 30, 2014; Responses shall be filed Friday, June 20, 2014; and Replies by

3

Thursday, July 3, 2014.

4
5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any hearing on challenges to expert witnesses
shall take place on or after Friday July 11, 2014.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all discovery, answers to interrogatories, and sup-

7

plements to interrogatories must be completed by Friday, August 8, 2014. In no event,

8

however, shall this provision alter the duties and obligations imposed upon the parties by

9

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e). This Order contemplates that each party will conduct

10

discovery in such a manner as to complete, within the deadline, any and all discovery. “Last

11

minute” or “eleventh hour” discovery which results in insufficient time to undertake

12

additional discovery and which requires an extension of the discovery deadline will be met

13

with disfavor, and could result in denial of an extension, exclusion of evidence, or the

14

imposition of other sanctions.

15

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery by interrogatory shall generally be

16

governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33. However, notwithstanding Federal Rule

17

of Civil Procedure 33, there is a limit of 30 interrogatories, including discrete subparts,

18

applicable to this case.

19

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that requests for admissions shall be governed by

20

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36. The parties shall serve no more than 20 requests for

21

admissions.

22

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED reminding counsel of their duty under Rule 26(e) of

23

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to supplement all Rule 26(a) disclosures and responses

24

to discovery requests. Pursuant to Rule 26(e)(1), any additions or other changes to

25

information previously disclosed must be made prior to the time that Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial

26

Disclosures are due. Since this Court effectively requires all Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial

27

Disclosures to be contained in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order, this Order contemplates that

28

-3-

1

all exhibits and witnesses that may be offered at trial will have been disclosed before the

2

close of discovery as established by the provisions of this Order. This Order therefore

3

supersedes the “thirty-day before trial” disclosure deadline contained in that Rule. Therefore

4

(1) failure to have timely supplemented a Rule 26(a) disclosure, including but not limited to

5

witnesses and exhibits, or (2) a failure to have timely supplemented responses to any valid

6

discovery requests, or (3) attempting to include any witnesses or exhibits in the Proposed

7

Final Pretrial Order that were not previously disclosed in a timely manner as to allow for

8

meaningful discovery prior to the discovery cutoff date as established by this Order, may

9

result in the exclusion of such evidence at trial or the imposition of other sanctions.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event of a discovery dispute, the parties

11

shall contact the Court to request a telephonic conference prior to filing any discovery

12

motions. The parties shall not contact the Court regarding a discovery dispute unless they

13

have been unable to resolve the dispute themselves, despite personal consultation and sincere

14

efforts to do so. The parties shall not file any written materials related to a discovery dispute

15

or discovery motion without express leave of Court. If the Court does order written

16

submissions, the movant shall include a statement certifying that counsel could not

17

satisfactorily resolve the matter despite personal consultation and sincere efforts to do so, in

18

accordance with LRCiv 7.2(j) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for

19

the District of Arizona.

20

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the disclosures of the identities of any persons

21

who may be used at trial to present evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 701, 702, 703,

22

704, or 705 shall also include all of the disclosures required by Federal Rule of Civil

23

Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) if the witness is either (1) retained or specifically employed to provide

24

expert testimony in the case, or (2) is an agent or employee of the party offering the

25

testimony whose duties regularly involve giving expert testimony.

26

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that depositions shall be limited as provided by Rules

27

30 and 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless the parties otherwise stipulate in

28

-4-

1

writing when permitted to do so pursuant to the Rules or when granted permission to depart

2

from the provisions of the Rules by Order of this Court. Notwithstanding any provision in

3

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules, the parties shall conduct no more

4

than 10 depositions.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(d)(1)

6

that there shall be a time limit of 7 hours2 to conduct a deposition of any witness in this case,

7

for the parties, and 4 hours for everyone else. Additional time shall be allowed where the

8

deponent or a party impedes or delays the examination. This time limit may only be

9

extended by Order of this Court upon motion of any party that demonstrates good cause for

10

doing so. Counsel shall conduct themselves courteously and professionally, especially

11

during the taking of depositions. Any objections made during the course of a deposition

12

must be in accordance with Rule 30(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that notwithstanding any provisions of the Federal

14

Rules of Civil Procedure or any other provisions of this Order, non-party witnesses shall not

15

be permitted to attend, either physically, electronically, or otherwise, the deposition of any

16

other witness in this case without an Order of this Court to the contrary.

17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dispositive motions shall be filed no later than

18

Friday, September 19, 2014. Such motions must be, in all respects, in full compliance with

19

the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

20
21
22
23
24

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the final disclosure of all witnesses, exhibits and
other matters under Rule 26(a)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. is Friday, September 19, 2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no submissions to the Court shall contain any
footnotes in excess of five (5) lines.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties are hereby specifically admonished that

25
26

2

27

The Court finds that a presumptive limit of seven (7) hours is sufficient for
depositions in a standard track civil case.

28

-5-

1

failure to respond to a motion by serving and filing an answering memorandum within the

2

time period expressly provided for in LRCiv 7.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States

3

District Court for the District of Arizona may be deemed a consent to the denial or granting

4

of the motion and the Court may then dispose of the motion summarily.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall not notice oral argument on any

6

motion. Instead, a party desiring oral argument on a motion shall request argument by

7

placing “Oral Argument Requested” immediately below the title of such motion, pursuant

8

to LRCiv 7.2(f) of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District

9

of Arizona. The Court will then issue a minute order scheduling the oral argument.

10

Oral argument shall be scheduled at the request of a party on all motions to dismiss

11

and motions for summary judgment. On all other motions on which a party requests oral

12

argument, the Court will determine whether oral argument is necessary. FURTHER, THE

13

PARTIES ARE REMINDED THAT OBTAINING A HEARING DATE IS PURELY

14

ADMINISTERIAL. ACCORDINGLY, REGARDLESS OF A HEARING DATE, THE

15

COURT MAY, AT ANY TIME AFTER THE MOTION IS FULLY BRIEFED,

16

DETERMINE THAT A HEARING IS UNWARRANTED AND RULE ON THE MOTION

17

WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT.

18

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions, requests, or stipulations for

19

extensions of time shall be made in accordance with the provisions of LRCiv 7.3 of the Rules

20

of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Notwithstanding

21

this directive, however, if such a motion, request, or stipulation seeks an extension of time

22

in which to file a memorandum in response or in reply to a motion previously noticed for oral

23

argument, under no circumstances shall such a motion, request, or stipulation seek an

24

extension that would preclude the Court from having at least thirty (30) days from the due

25

date for the filing of the reply memorandum to consider the merits of the underlying motion

26

unless the motion, request, or stipulation also seeks to vacate and reschedule the oral

27

argument. Any motion, request, or stipulation that so seeks both an extension of time and

28

-6-

1

rescheduling of a hearing shall contain a memorandum of points and authorities which

2

demonstrates good cause for the Court to grant the requested extension.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if no dispositive motions are pending before the

4

Court after the dispositive motions deadline has passed, Plaintiff(s) shall file a Notice of

5

Readiness for Order Re: Final Pretrial Conference within ten (10) days of the dispositive

6

motions deadline.

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if dispositive motions are pending before the

8

Court following the dispositive motions deadline, the Court will issue an Order Re: Final

9

Pretrial Conference following its resolution of the dispositive motions, if necessary.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order Re: Final Pretrial Conference shall: 1)

11

set deadlines for the filing of and response to motions in limine; 2) instruct the parties on

12

their duties in preparing for the Final Pretrial Conference and for trial; and 3) include a form

13

for the completion of the parties’ Proposed Pretrial Form of Order.

14

IT IS ORDERED that the attorneys for each party who will be responsible for trial

15

of the lawsuit shall APPEAR and PARTICIPATE in a Final Pretrial Conference on

16

Wednesday, January 13, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom # 605 on the sixth floor of the

17

United States Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona. Because the

18

Final Pretrial Conference is held for the benefit of all parties, and further because the

19

presence of all parties will facilitate frank discussion of the pertinent issues in the lawsuit,

20

each party, or a representative with binding settlement authority if the party is an

21

entity, shall attend the Final Pretrial Conference. At the Final Pretrial Conference, the Court

22

shall set a firm trial date.

23

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall keep the Court informed

24

regarding the possibility of settlement and should settlement be reached, the parties shall file

25

a Notice of Settlement with the Clerk of the Court.

26

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court views compliance with the provisions

27

of this Order as critical to its case management responsibilities and the responsibilities of the

28

-7-

1
2

parties under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DATED this 11th day of September, 2013.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-8-