Wilson v. Ryan et al
Filing
15
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14 ) is accepted and adopted by the Court. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custod y is denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and that the petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal of the petitioner's habeas p etition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 3/3/2014. (KMG)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
Robert Andrew Wilson,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
14
vs.
Charles Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-13-00383-PHX-PGR (DKD)
ORDER
16
Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
17
Judge Duncan notwithstanding that no party has filed an objection to the Report and
18
Recommendation, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge correctly determined
19
that the petitioner’s habeas corpus petition, filed on February 22, 2013 pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be dismissed as time-barred because it was filed nine
21
years after the AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations expired on February 26,
22
2004, and the petitioner has made no showing that the limitations period should be
23
equitably tolled. Therefore,
24
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 14) is accepted and adopted by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §
1
2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied and that
2
this action is dismissed with prejudice.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and
4
that the petitioner is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis because the dismissal
5
of the petitioner’s habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of
6
reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable.
7
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
accordingly.
DATED this 3rd day of March, 2014.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?