Cortes-Salcedo v. USA
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL the 25 Report and Recommendation and the Amended Motion to Vacate (Doc. 8 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is denied because jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the Court was correct in its procedural ruling. (See document for full details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 3/18/16. (LAD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Agustin Cortes-Salcedo,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-13-00424-PHX-ROS
United States of America,
13
Respondent.
14
15
16
On February 4, 2016, Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett issued a Report and
17
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court dismiss the Amended Motion to
18
Vacate based on Petitioner’s failure to prosecute. A copy of the R&R was sent to
19
Petitioner’s last known address but it was returned because Petitioner was no longer at
20
that address. (Doc. 27). With no way of contacting Petitioner, this case cannot continue.
21
And with no objections to the R&R, the Court need not conduct any review of its
22
conclusions. Therefore, the R&R will be adopted in full.
23
Accordingly,
24
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is ADOPTED IN
25
FULL and the Amended Motion to Vacate (Doc. 8) is DISMISSED WITHOUT
26
PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this
27
case.
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability is denied because
1
jurists of reason would not find it debatable whether the Court was correct in its
2
procedural ruling.
3
Dated this 18th day of March, 2016.
4
5
6
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?