Randall v. Ryan et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 17 Report and Recommendation is accepted; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice; a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/24/14. (REW)

Download PDF
    1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Armando Munoz Randall aka Armando M. Randall and Armando Randall, ORDER 10 11 12 No. CV13-0540 PHX DGC (DKD) Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 Petitioner Armando Munoz Randall has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate David K. Duncan has 18 issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be denied 19 and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 17. No objection has been filed, which relieves the 20 Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 22 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition. 23 IT IS ORDERED: 24 1. The R&R (Doc. 17) is accepted. 25 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed 26 with prejudice. 27 3. 28 A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied     1 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. 2 Dated this 24th day of February, 2014. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ‐ 2 ‐ 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?