Randall v. Ryan et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The 17 Report and Recommendation is accepted; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice; a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 2/24/14. (REW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Armando Munoz Randall aka Armando M.
Randall and Armando Randall,
ORDER
10
11
12
No. CV13-0540 PHX DGC (DKD)
Petitioner,
v.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
16
Petitioner Armando Munoz Randall has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus
17
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate David K. Duncan has
18
issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the petition be denied
19
and dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 17. No objection has been filed, which relieves the
20
Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.
21
72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
22
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the petition.
23
IT IS ORDERED:
24
1.
The R&R (Doc. 17) is accepted.
25
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and dismissed
26
with prejudice.
27
3.
28
A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
appeal are denied
1
4.
The Clerk is directed to terminate this action.
2
Dated this 24th day of February, 2014.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‐ 2 ‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?