Gutierrez v. McLaws et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting 28 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/16/2014.(DGC, nvo)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
12
ORDER
Plaintiff,
10
11
No. CV-13-00585-PHX-DGC
Jose Gutierrez,
v.
Seth McLaws et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
The United States has moved to quash a subpoena issued to the Department of
15
Homeland Security (“DHS”) on December 10, 2013. Doc. 28. The Court will grant the
16
motion.
17
The United States argues that Plaintiff has “failed to follow DHS regulations
18
governing the production of documents.”
Doc. 28 at 3.
19
regulations clearly state that in cases where DHS has not entered an appearance or given
20
notice of representation, “only the Office of the General Counsel is authorized to receive
21
and accept subpoenas[.]” 6 C.F.R. § 5.43. The Office of the General Counsel must
22
receive a writing setting forth “with as much specificity as possible, the nature and
23
relevance of the information sought.”
24
prohibited from producing documents “unless authorized to do so by the Office of the
25
General Counsel[.]” Id. at § 5.44(b).
Id. at § 5.45.
The Court agrees.
The
Further, DHS employees are
26
The subpoena in question was issued to “Office of the Chief Counsel, U.S.
27
Customs and Border Protection.” Doc. 30. There is no evidence that Plaintiff served the
28
subpoena on DHS’s Office of the General Counsel or provided that office a writing
1
setting forth with specificity the nature and relevance of the information sought. Because
2
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the appropriate regulations, the Court will grant the
3
motion to quash. See United States v. Henson, 123 F.3d 1226, 1237 (9th Cir. 1997)
4
(upholding the district court’s decision to quash a subpoena where the plaintiff failed to
5
follow an agency’s procedures for obtaining records).
6
IT IS ORDERED that the United States’ motion to quash (Doc. 28) is granted.
7
Dated this 16th day of January, 2014.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?