Jamali v. Low et al
ORDER: Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle's R&R (Doc. 237 ) is accepted. Plaintiff's Motion to Order a Property Seizure to Satisfy a Default Judgment (Doc. 206 ) and Motion to Order Judgment/Debtor to Turnover Property (Doc. 236 ) are GRANTED and Plaintiff is directed to file a proposed writ of execution for the Clerk of Courts signature. Plaintiff's Motion to Add Collection to Default judgment (Doc. 235 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/01/2015. (REK)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Imran Ahmad Jamali,
Stephanie Danica Low, et al.,
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Order a Property Seizure to
Satisfy a Default Judgment (Doc. 206), Motion to Add Collection to Default Judgment
(Doc. 235), Motion to Order Judgment/Debtor Judgment against Defendant Adair (Doc.
236) and United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle’s Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) (Doc. 237). The R&R recommends that the Court grant two of the Motions
(Docs. 206, 236) and deny the third Motion (Doc. 235). Doc. 237 at 6. The Magistrate
Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and
that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain
review of the R&R. Id. at 7 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to
review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must
determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly
objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-
taken. The Court will accept the R&R as indicated above. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the
findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The
district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further
evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”).
IT IS ORDERED:
Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle’s R&R (Doc. 237) is accepted.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Order a Property Seizure to Satisfy a Default
Judgment (Doc. 206) and Motion to Order Judgment/Debtor to Turnover Property (Doc.
236) are GRANTED and Plaintiff is directed to file a proposed writ of execution for the
Clerk of Court’s signature.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Add Collection to Default judgment (Doc. 235) is
Dated this 1st day of October, 2015.
Honorable G. Murray Snow
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?